aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lang
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authortijl <tijl@FreeBSD.org>2013-03-23 00:54:51 +0800
committertijl <tijl@FreeBSD.org>2013-03-23 00:54:51 +0800
commit928f60d5727cfbf9b1fbb92142c4405ae251c7e5 (patch)
treeea452ff5ac949ae4aa16015f26699b6fe05e8c69 /lang
parentacf9f2a907ba792237c7d74b87ea55211a316309 (diff)
downloadfreebsd-ports-gnome-928f60d5727cfbf9b1fbb92142c4405ae251c7e5.tar.gz
freebsd-ports-gnome-928f60d5727cfbf9b1fbb92142c4405ae251c7e5.tar.zst
freebsd-ports-gnome-928f60d5727cfbf9b1fbb92142c4405ae251c7e5.zip
Fix build with boost 1.52.
Approved by: crees Obtained from: sdcc revision 8145
Diffstat (limited to 'lang')
-rw-r--r--lang/sdcc/Makefile6
-rw-r--r--lang/sdcc/files/patch-boost55
2 files changed, 55 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/lang/sdcc/Makefile b/lang/sdcc/Makefile
index edd839051cbd..ef051d8e5fa3 100644
--- a/lang/sdcc/Makefile
+++ b/lang/sdcc/Makefile
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
-# New ports collection makefile for: sdcc
-# Date created: 3 May 2004
-# Whom: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>
-#
# $FreeBSD$
-#
PORTNAME= sdcc
PORTVERSION= 3.2.0
@@ -23,7 +18,6 @@ CONFLICTS_INSTALL= sdcc-[0-9]*
GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
USE_BZIP2= yes
USE_GMAKE= yes
-USE_GCC= 4.6+
OPTIONS_DEFINE= DEVLIB DOCS HC08 MCS51 PIC UCSIM Z80
OPTIONS_DEFAULT=${OPTIONS_DEFINE:NDOCS}
diff --git a/lang/sdcc/files/patch-boost b/lang/sdcc/files/patch-boost
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e06c27eba0ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lang/sdcc/files/patch-boost
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+--- src/SDCCtree_dec.hpp.orig
++++ src/SDCCtree_dec.hpp
+@@ -53,6 +53,14 @@
+ #include <boost/graph/copy.hpp>
+ #include <boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp>
+
++struct forget_properties
++{
++ template<class T1, class T2>
++ void operator()(const T1&, const T2&) const
++ {
++ }
++};
++
+ // Thorup algorithm D.
+ // The use of the multimap makes the complexity of this O(|I|log|I|), which could be reduced to O(|I|).
+ template <class l_t>
+@@ -152,7 +160,7 @@
+ {
+ // Should we do this? Or just use G as J? The Thorup paper seems unclear, it speaks of statements that contain jumps to other statements, but does it count as a jump, when they're just subsequent?
+ boost::adjacency_list<boost::vecS, boost::vecS, boost::directedS> J;
+- boost::copy_graph(G, J);
++ boost::copy_graph(G, J, boost::vertex_copy(forget_properties()).edge_copy(forget_properties()));
+ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < boost::num_vertices(J) - 1; i++)
+ remove_edge(i, i + 1, J);
+
+@@ -256,7 +264,7 @@
+
+ // Todo: Implement a graph adaptor for boost that allows to treat directed graphs as undirected graphs.
+ boost::adjacency_list<boost::vecS, boost::vecS, boost::undirectedS> G_sym;
+- boost::copy_graph(G, G_sym);
++ boost::copy_graph(G, G_sym, boost::vertex_copy(forget_properties()).edge_copy(forget_properties()));
+
+ std::vector<bool> active(boost::num_vertices(G), true);
+
+--- src/SDCCralloc.hpp.orig
++++ src/SDCCralloc.hpp
+@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@
+ for (var_t i = boost::num_vertices(con) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
+ {
+ cfg_sym_t cfg2;
+- boost::copy_graph(cfg, cfg2);
++ boost::copy_graph(cfg, cfg2, boost::vertex_copy(forget_properties()).edge_copy(forget_properties()));
+ for (int j = boost::num_vertices(cfg) - 1; j >= 0; j--)
+ {
+ if (cfg[j].alive.find(i) == cfg[j].alive.end())
+@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
+ #endif
+ // Non-connected CFGs shouldn't exist either. Another problem with dead code eliminarion.
+ cfg_sym_t cfg2;
+- boost::copy_graph(cfg, cfg2);
++ boost::copy_graph(cfg, cfg2, boost::vertex_copy(forget_properties()).edge_copy(forget_properties()));
+ std::vector<boost::graph_traits<cfg_t>::vertices_size_type> component(num_vertices(cfg2));
+ boost::connected_components(cfg2, &component[0]);
+