diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | security/vuxml/vuln.xml | 36 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml index 9ddc126d8aaf..17202baf44ce 100644 --- a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml +++ b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml @@ -34,6 +34,42 @@ Note: Please add new entries to the beginning of this file. --> <vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1"> + <vuln vid="67b514c3-ba8f-11df-8f6e-000c29a67389"> + <topic>sudo -- Flaw in Runas group matching</topic> + <affects> + <package> + <name>sudo</name> + <range><ge>1.7.0</ge><lt>1.7.4.4</lt></range> + </package> + </affects> + <description> + <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>Todd Miller reports:</p> + <blockquote cite="http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/runas_group.html"> + <p>Beginning with sudo version 1.7.0 it has been possible to grant + permission to run a command using a specified group via sudo -g + option (run as group). A flaw exists in the logic that matches + Runas groups in the sudoers file when the -u option is also + specified (run as user). This flaw results in a positive match for + the user specified via -u so long as the group specified via -g + is allowed by the sudoers file.</p> + <p>Exploitation of the flaw requires that Sudo be configured with + sudoers entries that contain a Runas group. Entries that do not + contain a Runas group, or only contain a Runas user are not + affected.</p> + </blockquote> + </body> + </description> + <references> + <cvename>CVE-2010-2956</cvename> + <url>http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/runas_group.html</url> + </references> + <dates> + <discovery>2010-09-07</discovery> + <entry>2010-09-07</entry> + </dates> + </vuln> + <vuln vid="29b7e3f4-b6a9-11df-ae63-f255a795cb21"> <topic>lftp -- multiple HTTP client download filename vulnerability</topic> <affects> |