aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/INDEX-5
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Since INDEX version in CVS is always too old, portmgr decided tokrion2004-11-131-11735/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | remove it. You will still be able to build your own INDEX or use 'fetchindex' target in /usr/ports/. The last INDEX song ever. (sung to the tune of "Imagine" by John Lennon) Imagine there's no INDEX It's easy if you try It was a hard decision It should now go and die Imagine all the people Building INDEX today... Imagine there's no ports Is it so hard to do ? Nothing to break or fix for And no GNOME too Imagine all the people Fetching INDEX today... You may say I'm a dreamer But the hacks must go away I hope someday you won't break it And let the downloads rule the day Imagine there's no cluster I wonder if you can Two hundreds ports are broken Please help us, Uncle Sam Imagine all the people Loving INDEX today... You may say I'm a dreamer But the hacks must go away I hope someday you won't break it And let the downloads rule the day
* "Another Patch in the File (part 2)" by Port Floydkris2004-10-151-10559/+11735
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | o/~ We don't need no engineering We dont need no source control No crypto checksums on the distfiles Porters leave them files alone Hey! Porters! Leave them files alone! All in all it's just another patch in the file. All in all you're just another patch in the file. We don't need no engineering We dont need no source control No crypto checksums on the distfiles Porters leave them files alone Hey! Porters! Leave them files alone! All in all it's just another patch in the file. All in all you're just another patch in the file. "Wrong, pointy hat!" "If you don't fix yer ports, you can't have any packages! How can you have any packages if you don't fix yer ports?" "You! Yes, you behind the bikesheds! Stand still, laddy!" o/~ This is the official INDEX for 5.3-RELEASE, with 11735 ports.
* New INDEX-5 for 5.x, with 10559 portskris2004-03-161-8167/+9003
|
* Yakety, yak, slip that tag...marcus2004-02-141-7/+7
| | | | Once more for 5.2.1-RELEASE.
* Update the 5.2.1 INDEX with the recent XFree86-Server fixes.marcus2004-02-121-7/+7
|
* Fixing kusermarcus2004-01-271-5/+4
| | | | | | | | | Don't delete the root account The tag has been slipped This is the 5.2.1-RELEASE INDEX file (now with 9723 ports). Haiku by: kris (lyrics printed with permission of Obsecurity Records)
* This is the 5.2-RELEASE INDEX-5 file. As I was looking back on the daysmarcus2003-12-051-5970/+5972
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | leading up to the src and ports freeze, one thing stood out. My freebsd-current mail folder had was larger than a Slashdot thread on Microsoft acquiring RedHat. Was all of this patches to fix the 5.2-RELEASE TODO items? Nope. But it was part of FreeBSD none-the-less. So, in honor of those countless messages, I proudly present "Bikeshed," a song sung to the tune of Devo's classic, "Whip it." Paint that shed Restart the same old thread Flame that list Now everyone is pissed When 5.2-RELEASE comes along You must bikeshed We need a new commit song Call it "Bikeshed" The developer is wrong You must bikeshed! Dynamically link /sbin You must bikeshed Do the same to /bin You must bikeshed No one gets their way When they bikeshed I say bikeshed! Paint it blue This INDEX-5 file contains 9724 ports (no, it's not prime).
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 9722 ports.kris2003-11-241-4087/+4296
|
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 9513 ports.kris2003-10-191-6995/+7472
|
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 9036 ports (37 fewer than last time due tokris2003-08-161-1666/+1629
| | | | the recent reaping spree)
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 9073 ports.kris2003-08-041-5583/+5790
|
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 8866 ports.kris2003-06-221-5592/+5767
|
* Regenerate INDEX for the usual last-minute tag slippage.kris2003-06-021-56/+56
|
* _Bughunter_kris2003-06-011-3878/+3937
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (with apologies to Front 242) Dedicated to Alan L. Cox. o/~ Freeze! Send SIGKILL or die! This page is unclaimed, it's alone and anonymous, But written in the code it's got the marks of a genius. I'm locking down this RAM, to share it with other RAM, To share it with other RAM, on 10 CPUs at least. I'm locking down this RAM, I know the rules of the game. I'm able to rewrite them to realize our aim: I'm locking down this RAM to make us rich and famous! One: you lock the mutex, Two: you cache some files, Three: you download from the net, and Four: you crash VM! You crash VM! o/~ This is the INDEX for 5.1, with 8691 ports.
* New INDEX for 5.1, with 8632 portskris2003-05-171-5729/+5854
|
* New INDEX for 5.0, with 8507 ports.kris2003-04-191-4423/+4598
|
* New INDEX for 5.0, with 8332 ports.kris2003-03-161-4504/+4624
|
* New INDEX for 5.x, with 8212 portskris2003-02-091-5078/+5407
|
* Last-minute update to include new isc-dhcp3 in RELEASE_5_0_0 index.kris2003-01-161-2/+2
|
* Patch up INDEX for RELEASE_5_0_0 to include last-minute postgresql andkris2003-01-121-37/+37
| | | | gdm2 changes.
* Should auld releases be forgot,kris2003-01-011-3646/+3631
| | | | | | | | | | | | | And never brought to mind? Should auld releases be forgot, And ports of auld lang syne? And ports of auld lang syne, my dear, And ports of auld lang syne. Should auld releases be forgot, And ports of auld lang syne? This is the INDEX for 5.0-RELEASE (barring last-minute changes), with 7883 ports. 7883 is a prime number!
* Add a separate INDEX file for 5.0 systems. This is necessary becausekris2002-12-061-0/+7898
ports built on 4.x and 5.0 have substantially different dependency lists (mostly due to various system components being moved out of the base system and into the ports tree, such as perl).
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2024-11-18 15:24:12 +0800