freebsd-ports-gnome - FreeBSD GNOME current development ports (https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports-gnome)

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	This is the 5.2-RELEASE INDEX-5 file. As I was looking back on the days	marcus	2003-12-05	1	-5970/+5972
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	leading up to the src and ports freeze, one thing stood out. My freebsd-current mail folder had was larger than a Slashdot thread on Microsoft acquiring RedHat. Was all of this patches to fix the 5.2-RELEASE TODO items? Nope. But it was part of FreeBSD none-the-less. So, in honor of those countless messages, I proudly present "Bikeshed," a song sung to the tune of Devo's classic, "Whip it." Paint that shed Restart the same old thread Flame that list Now everyone is pissed When 5.2-RELEASE comes along You must bikeshed We need a new commit song Call it "Bikeshed" The developer is wrong You must bikeshed! Dynamically link /sbin You must bikeshed Do the same to /bin You must bikeshed No one gets their way When they bikeshed I say bikeshed! Paint it blue This INDEX-5 file contains 9724 ports (no, it's not prime).
*	New INDEX for 5.x, with 9722 ports.	kris	2003-11-24	1	-4087/+4296
\|
*	New INDEX for 5.x, with 9513 ports.	kris	2003-10-19	1	-6995/+7472
\|
*	New INDEX for 5.x, with 9036 ports (37 fewer than last time due to	kris	2003-08-16	1	-1666/+1629
\| \| \| \|	the recent reaping spree)
*	New INDEX for 5.x, with 9073 ports.	kris	2003-08-04	1	-5583/+5790
\|
*	New INDEX for 5.x, with 8866 ports.	kris	2003-06-22	1	-5592/+5767
\|
*	Regenerate INDEX for the usual last-minute tag slippage.	kris	2003-06-02	1	-56/+56
\|
*	_Bughunter_	kris	2003-06-01	1	-3878/+3937
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	(with apologies to Front 242) Dedicated to Alan L. Cox. o/~ Freeze! Send SIGKILL or die! This page is unclaimed, it's alone and anonymous, But written in the code it's got the marks of a genius. I'm locking down this RAM, to share it with other RAM, To share it with other RAM, on 10 CPUs at least. I'm locking down this RAM, I know the rules of the game. I'm able to rewrite them to realize our aim: I'm locking down this RAM to make us rich and famous! One: you lock the mutex, Two: you cache some files, Three: you download from the net, and Four: you crash VM! You crash VM! o/~ This is the INDEX for 5.1, with 8691 ports.
*	New INDEX for 5.1, with 8632 ports	kris	2003-05-17	1	-5729/+5854
\|
*	New INDEX for 5.0, with 8507 ports.	kris	2003-04-19	1	-4423/+4598
\|
*	New INDEX for 5.0, with 8332 ports.	kris	2003-03-16	1	-4504/+4624
\|
*	New INDEX for 5.x, with 8212 ports	kris	2003-02-09	1	-5078/+5407
\|
*	Last-minute update to include new isc-dhcp3 in RELEASE_5_0_0 index.	kris	2003-01-16	1	-2/+2
\|
*	Patch up INDEX for RELEASE_5_0_0 to include last-minute postgresql and	kris	2003-01-12	1	-37/+37
\| \| \| \|	gdm2 changes.
*	Should auld releases be forgot,	kris	2003-01-01	1	-3646/+3631
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	And never brought to mind? Should auld releases be forgot, And ports of auld lang syne? And ports of auld lang syne, my dear, And ports of auld lang syne. Should auld releases be forgot, And ports of auld lang syne? This is the INDEX for 5.0-RELEASE (barring last-minute changes), with 7883 ports. 7883 is a prime number!
*	Add a separate INDEX file for 5.0 systems. This is necessary because	kris	2002-12-06	1	-0/+7898
	ports built on 4.x and 5.0 have substantially different dependency lists (mostly due to various system components being moved out of the base system and into the ports tree, such as perl).