| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Specifically, newer autoconf (> 2.13) has different semantic of the
configure target. In short, one should use --build=CONFIGURE_TARGET
instead of CONFIGURE_TARGET directly. Otherwise, you will get a warning
and the old semantic may be removed in later autoconf releases.
To workaround this issue, many ports hack the CONFIGURE_TARGET variable
so that it contains the ``--build='' prefix.
To solve this issue, under the fact that some ports still have
configure script generated by the old autoconf, we use runtime detection
in the do-configure target so that the proper argument can be used.
Changes to Mk/*:
- Add runtime detection magic in bsd.port.mk
- Remove CONFIGURE_TARGET hack in various bsd.*.mk
- USE_GNOME=gnometarget is now an no-op
Changes to individual ports, other than removing the CONFIGURE_TARGET hack:
= pkg-plist changed (due to the ugly CONFIGURE_TARGET prefix in * executables)
- comms/gnuradio
- science/abinit
- science/elmer-fem
- science/elmer-matc
- science/elmer-meshgen2d
- science/elmerfront
- science/elmerpost
= use x86_64 as ARCH
- devel/g-wrap
= other changes
- print/magicfilter
GNU_CONFIGURE -> HAS_CONFIGURE since it's not generated by autoconf
Total # of ports modified: 1,027
Total # of ports affected: ~7,000 (set GNU_CONFIGURE to yes)
PR: 126524 (obsoletes 52917)
Submitted by: rafan
Tested on: two pointyhat 7-amd64 exp runs (by pav)
Approved by: portmgr (pav)
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: krion@
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: krion@
PR: ports/88711 (related)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: krion@
PR: ports/88711 (related)
|
|
|
|
| |
Reported by: kris
|
|
|
|
| |
Pointy hat to: pav
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/80690
Submitted by: chinsan <chinsan@mail2000.com.tw>
Approved by: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com> (maintainer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Set LATEST_LINK, CONFLICTS
- Set chinese/joe to use editors/joe2
Suggested by: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com> (maintainer)
Repocopy by: marcus
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/46750
Submitted by: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 42920
Submitted by: maintainer
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 34802
Submitted by: maintainer
|
|
|
|
| |
Reminded by: Dan Peterson <danp@danp.net>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 34540
Submitted by: maintainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 27710
Submitted by: Jung-an Fan <rafan@ck.tp.edu.tw> - the problem report
maintainer - the patch
|
|
|
|
|
| |
would be able to insert their own entries (usually language category)
upfront.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bump PORTREVISION
Submitted by: brad@comstyle.com
Obtained from: OpenBSD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- un-forbid
- bump PORTREVISION
Submitted by: maintainer
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
file which is hard-linked to a file writable by the user who is
running joe. Mark this forbidden until the maintainer decides what
to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
creating a DEADJOE file (http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/145305)
- make DEADJOE files with 0600 permissions, rather than using the
user's umask (PR 12827)
- do the PORTREVISION thing
I am not sure whether the maintainer considers these ready. However,
they work for me.
Submitted by: maintainer
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 18165
Submitted by: Kevin Day <toasty@dragondata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
andrews@technologist.com -> will@FreeBSD.org. :-)
Reminded by: asami
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 15741
Submitted by: Sergey N. Voronkov <serg@dor.zaural.ru>
Reviewed by: maintainer
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 15330
Submitted by: Oliver Breuninger <ob@seicom.net>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prompted by PR: 13476, 13477
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 12827
Submitted by: Maintainer
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 12405
Submitted by: andrews@technologist.com
|
|
|
|
|
| |
permitted. Note that, given current numeric motif of PW, this is done
in four equally-sized commits of 393 files each.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
emacsen (*mule-common, mule). That is left for someone more
familiar with their twisty incestuous relationships.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/4521
Submitted by: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
all the COMMENTs! No package names, no version numbers, no "this is
absolutix-3.1.2" type comments that have zero information contents.
Now, without any bad examples to follow, nobody has an excuse to import
a port with those kind of comments. :)
Phew! 238 ports modified!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
===
JOE is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) any later version.
=== ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Since it's not (only) under GPL1, there shouldn't be any problem
with us distributing it in any medium.
|
|
|