| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
e-mail addresses from the pkg-descr file that could reasonably
be mistaken for maintainer contact information in order to avoid
confusion on the part of users looking for support. As a pleasant
side effect this also avoids confusion and/or frustration for people
who are no longer maintaining those ports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The affected ports are the ones with gettext as a run-dependency
according to ports/INDEX-7 (5007 of them) and the ones with USE_GETTEXT
in Makefile (29 of them).
PR: ports/124340
Submitted by: edwin@
Approved by: portmgr (pav)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/81123
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru <tkato432@yahoo.com>
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed by: marcus
|
|
|
|
| |
(Part 2)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
to files/ in ports/58222 had already corrected the compile problem.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/58222
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
skk port is a meta-port and (presumably) does not require skk-elisp to
run. I have removed the skk-elisp dependency from skk. The skkfep port
did not depend on skk-elisp explicitly, only via the skk port.
|
|
|
|
| |
has now been removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also convert COMMENT while I'm here.
List of candidate ports from
PR: 47881
Submitted by: Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@hadaly.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
is better studied
o Turn PORTCOMMENT variable in Makefile back into pkg-comment files
Approved by: kris (portmgr hat),
portmgr, re (silence)
|
|
|
|
| |
Approved by: pat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Remove obsolete WWW: line
- Do not link libxpg4.
PR: ports/42040
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
away again: the porting-samplem [sic] chapter of the Porter's
Handbook says the line is mandatory. Also, portlint complains
"FATAL: no MAINTAINER listed in Makefile."
Reviewed by: maintainer ;-) (ports list)
|
|
|
|
| |
default in bsd.ports.mk to come through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/20426
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.ne.jp> (Ports Fury!)
By the way, why didn't this port have a MAINTAINER line? I set it to
-ports list, but someone should take it over.. Kato-san? :>
|
|
|
|
| |
over 2 months.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/19199
Submitted by: tomoShige Tashiro <shige2@pop17.odn.ne.jp>
|
|
|
|
| |
PORT{NAME,VERSION}/PKGNAME{PRE,SUF}FIX variables.
|
| |
|
|
PR: ports/7576
Submitted by: Yusuke NAWANO <azuki@azkey.org>
|