aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
blob: 86a18ffbdc92a0ffdbaa7b63b45563662ef36496 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!--
Copyright 2003, 2004 Jacques Vidrine and contributors

Redistribution and use in source (VuXML) and 'compiled' forms (SGML,
HTML, PDF, PostScript, RTF and so forth) with or without modification,
are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
1. Redistributions of source code (VuXML) must retain the above
   copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following
   disclaimer as the first lines of this file unmodified.
2. Redistributions in compiled form (transformed to other DTDs,
   published online in any format, converted to PDF, PostScript,
   RTF and other formats) must reproduce the above copyright
   notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
   in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
   distribution.

THIS DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS
BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY,
OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT
OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY,
WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE
OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENTATION,
EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

-->
<!DOCTYPE vuxml PUBLIC "-//vuxml.org//DTD VuXML 1.0//EN"
  "http://www.vuxml.org/dtd/vuxml-1/vuxml-10.dtd">
<vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1">

  <vuln vid="6fd02439-5d70-11d8-80e3-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Several remotely exploitable buffer overflows in gaim</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
    <name>gaim</name>
    <range><lt>0.75_3</lt></range>
    <range><eq>0.75_5</eq></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Stefan Esser of e-matters found almost a dozen remotely
      exploitable vulnerabilities in Gaim.  From the e-matters
      advisory:</p>
    <blockquote cite="http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/012004.txt">
          <p>While developing a custom add-on, an integer overflow
          in the handling of AIM DirectIM packets was revealed that
          could lead to a remote compromise of the IM client. After
          disclosing this bug to the vendor, they had to make a
          hurried release because of a change in the Yahoo connection
          procedure that rendered GAIM useless. Unfourtunately at the
          same time a closer look onto the sourcecode revealed 11 more
          vulnerabilities.</p>

          <p>The 12 identified problems range from simple standard
          stack overflows, over heap overflows to an integer overflow
          that can be abused to cause a heap overflow. Due to the
          nature of instant messaging many of these bugs require
          man-in-the-middle attacks between client and server. But the
          underlying protocols are easy to implement and MIM attacks
          on ordinary TCP sessions is a fairly simple task.</p>

          <p>In combination with the latest kernel vulnerabilities or
          the habit of users to work as root/administrator these bugs
          can result in remote root compromises.</p>
    </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/012004.txt</url>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0005</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0006</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0007</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0008</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004/01/26</discovery>
      <entry>2004/02/12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3388eff9-5d6e-11d8-80e3-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Samba 3.0.x password initialization bug</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
    <name>samba</name>
    <range><ge>3.0,1</ge><lt>3.0.1_2,1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>From the Samba 3.0.2 release notes:</p>
    <blockquote cite="http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.2.html">
          <p>Security Announcement: It has been confirmed that
          previous versions of Samba 3.0 are susceptible to a password
          initialization bug that could grant an attacker unauthorized
          access to a user account created by the mksmbpasswd.sh shell
          script.</p>
        </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.2.html</url>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0082</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004/02/09</discovery>
      <entry>2004/02/12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="74a9541d-5d6c-11d8-80e3-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>clamav remote denial-of-service</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
    <name>clamav</name>
    <range><lt>0.65_7</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>clamav will exit when a programming
      assertion is not met.  A malformed uuencoded message can
      trigger this assertion, allowing an attacker to trivially
      crash clamd or other components of clamav.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/62586</url>
      <url>http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/353186</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004/02/09</discovery>
      <entry>2004/02/12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="3837f462-5d6b-11d8-80e3-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Buffer overflows in XFree86 servers</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
    <name>XFree86-Server</name>
    <range><le>4.3.0_13</le></range>
    <range><ge>4.3.99</ge><le>4.3.99.15_1</le></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>A number of buffer overflows were recently discovered in
          XFree86, prompted by initial discoveries by iDEFENSE.  These
          buffer overflows are present in the font alias handling.  An
      attacker with authenticated access to a running X server may
          exploit these vulnerabilities to obtain root privileges on
          the machine running the X server.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=72</url>
      <url>http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=73</url>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0083</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0084</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0106</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004/02/10</discovery>
      <entry>2004/02/12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="67c05283-5d62-11d8-80e3-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Buffer overflow in Mutt 1.4</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
    <name>mutt</name>
    <name>ja-mutt</name>
    <range><ge>1.4</ge><lt>1.4.2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>Mutt 1.4 contains a buffer overflow that could be exploited
      with a specially formed message, causing Mutt to crash or
      possibly execute arbitrary code.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0078</cvename>
      <url>http://www.mutt.org/news.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004/02/11</discovery>
      <entry>2004/02/12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="7557a2b1-5d63-11d8-80e3-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Apache-SSL optional client certificate vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
    <name>apache+ssl</name>
    <range><lt>1.3.29.1.53</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>From the Apache-SSL security advisory:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>If configured with SSLVerifyClient set to 1 or 3 (client
          certificates optional) and SSLFakeBasicAuth, Apache-SSL
          1.3.28+1.52 and all earlier versions would permit a
          client to use real basic authentication to forge a client
      certificate.</p>

      <p>All the attacker needed is the "one-line DN" of a valid
          user, as used by faked basic auth in Apache-SSL, and the
      fixed password ("password" by default).</p>
    </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://www.apache-ssl.org/advisory-20040206.txt</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004/02/06</discovery>
      <entry>2004/02/10</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="96ba2dae-4ab0-11d8-96f2-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>L2TP, ISAKMP, and RADIUS parsing vulnerabilities in
      tcpdump</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>tcpdump</name>
        <range><lt>3.8.1_351</lt></range>
      </package>
      <system>
        <name>FreeBSD</name>
        <range><lt>5.2.1</lt></range>
      </system>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Jonathan Heusser discovered vulnerabilities in tcpdump's
        L2TP, ISAKMP, and RADIUS protocol handlers.  These
        vulnerabilities may be used by an attacker to crash a running
        `tcpdump' process.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-0989</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-1029</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0057</cvename>
      <url>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tcpdump-workers&amp;m=107228187124962&amp;w=2</url>
      <url>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tcpdump-workers&amp;m=107325073018070&amp;w=2</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-12-24</discovery>
      <entry>2004-01-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="20be2982-4aae-11d8-96f2-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>fsp buffer overflow and directory traversal vulnerabilities</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>fspd</name>
        <range><gt>0</gt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>The <a href="http://www.debian.org/security">Debian
        security team</a> reported a pair of vulnerabilities in
        fsp:</p>
        <blockquote cite="http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-416">
          <p>A vulnerability was discovered in fsp, client utilities
          for File Service Protocol (FSP), whereby a remote user could
          both escape from the FSP root directory (CAN-2003-1022), and
          also overflow a fixed-length buffer to execute arbitrary
          code (CAN-2004-0011).</p>
        </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-1022</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2004-0011</cvename>
      <url>http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-416</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004-01-06</discovery>
      <entry>2004-01-19</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="fd376b8b-41e1-11d8-b096-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Buffer overflow in INN control message handling</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>inn</name>
        <range><lt>2.4.1</lt></range>
      </package>
      <package>
        <name>inn-stable</name>
        <range><lt>20031022_1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>A small, fixed-size stack buffer is used to construct a
          filename based on a received control message.  This could
          result in a stack buffer overflow.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://lists.litech.org/pipermail/inn-workers/2004q1/002763.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004-01-07</discovery>
      <entry>2004-01-08</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="cf0fb426-3f96-11d8-b096-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>ProFTPD ASCII translation bug resulting in remote root
      compromise</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>proftpd</name>
        <range><lt>1.2.8_1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>A buffer overflow exists in the ProFTPD code that handles
          translation of newline characters during ASCII-mode file
          uploads.  An attacker may exploit this buffer overflow by
          uploading a specially crafted file, resulting in code
          execution and ultimately a remote root compromise.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/alerts/id/154</url>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-0831</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-09-23</discovery>
      <entry>2004-01-05</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>
  <vuln vid="f04cc5cb-2d0b-11d8-beaf-000a95c4d922">
    <topic>bind8 negative cache poison attack</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>bind</name>
        <range><ge>8.3</ge><lt>8.3.7</lt></range>
        <range><ge>8.4</ge><lt>8.4.3</lt></range>
      </package>
      <system>
        <name>FreeBSD</name>
        <range><ge>5.1</ge><lt>5.1p11</lt></range>
        <range><ge>5.0</ge><lt>5.0p19</lt></range>
        <range><ge>4.9</ge><lt>4.9p1</lt></range>
        <range><ge>4.8</ge><lt>4.8p14</lt></range>
        <range><ge>4.7</ge><lt>4.7p24</lt></range>
        <range><ge>4.6</ge><lt>4.6.2p27</lt></range>
        <range><ge>4.5</ge><lt>4.5p37</lt></range>
        <range><lt>4.4p47</lt></range>
      </system>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>A programming error in BIND 8 named can result in a DNS
        message being incorrectly cached as a negative response.  As
        a result, an attacker may arrange for malicious DNS messages
        to be delivered to a target name server, and cause that name
        server to cache a negative response for some target domain
        name.  The name server would thereafter respond negatively
        to legitimate queries for that domain name, resulting in a
        denial-of-service for applications that require DNS.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-0914</cvename>
      <freebsdsa>SA-03:19</freebsdsa>
      <certvu>734644</certvu>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-11-28</discovery>
      <entry>2003-12-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="81313647-2d03-11d8-9355-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>ElGamal sign+encrypt keys created by GnuPG can be
      compromised</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>gnupg</name>
        <range><ge>1.0.2</ge><lt>1.2.3_4</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Any ElGamal sign+encrypt keys created by GnuPG contain a
          cryptographic weakness that may allow someone to obtain
          the private key. <strong>These keys should be considered
          unusable and should be revoked.</strong></p>
        <p>The following summary was written by Werner Koch, GnuPG
          author:</p>
        <blockquote cite="http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2003-November/020570.html">
          <p>Phong Nguyen identified a severe bug in the way GnuPG
            creates and uses ElGamal keys for signing.  This is
            a significant security failure which can lead to a
            compromise of almost all ElGamal keys used for signing.
            Note that this is a real world vulnerability which will
            reveal your private key within a few seconds.</p>
          <p>...</p>
          <p>Please <em>take immediate action and revoke your ElGamal
            signing keys</em>.  Furthermore you should take whatever
            measures necessary to limit the damage done for signed or
            encrypted documents using that key.</p>
          <p>Note that the standard keys as generated by GnuPG (DSA
            and ElGamal encryption) as well as RSA keys are NOT
            vulnerable.  Note also that ElGamal signing keys cannot
            be generated without the use of a special flag to enable
            hidden options and even then overriding a warning message
            about this key type.  See below for details on how to
            identify vulnerable keys.</p>
        </blockquote>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-0971</cvename>
      <url>http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2003-November/020570.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-11-27</discovery>
      <entry>2003-12-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="96fdbf5b-2cfd-11d8-9355-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Mathopd buffer overflow</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>mathopd</name>
        <range><lt>1.4p2</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Mathopd contains a buffer overflow in the prepare_reply()
          function that may be remotely exploitable.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://www.mail-archive.com/mathopd%40mathopd.org/msg00136.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-12-04</discovery>
      <entry>2003-12-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="d7af61c8-2cc0-11d8-9355-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>lftp HTML parsing vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>lftp</name>
        <range><le>2.6.10</le></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>A buffer overflow exists in lftp which may be triggered when
          requesting a directory listing from a malicious server over
          HTTP.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-0963</cvename>
      <url>http://lftp.yar.ru/news.html#2.6.10</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-12-11</discovery>
      <entry>2003-12-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="af0296be-2455-11d8-82e5-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Fetchmail address parsing vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>fetchmail</name>
        <range><le>6.2.0</le></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Fetchmail can be crashed by a malicious email message.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://security.e-matters.de/advisories/052002.html</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-10-25</discovery>
      <entry>2003-10-25</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="2bcd2d24-24ca-11d8-82e5-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Buffer overflow in pam_smb password handling</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>pam_smb</name>
        <range><lt>1.9.9_3</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Applications utilizing pam_smb can be compromised by
          any user who can enter a password.  In many cases,
          this is a remote root compromise.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied/pam_smb/</url>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-0686</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-10-25</discovery>
      <entry>2003-10-25</entry>
      <modified>2003-10-25</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="c4b7badf-24ca-11d8-82e5-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Buffer overflows in libmcrypt</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>libmcrypt</name>
        <range><lt>2.5.6</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>libmcrypt does incomplete input validation, leading to
          several buffer overflow vuxml.  Additionally,
          a memory leak is present.  Both of these problems may be
          exploited in a denial-of-service attack.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2003/Jan/0022.html</url>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-0031</cvename>
      <cvename>CAN-2003-0032</cvename>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2003-10-25</discovery>
      <entry>2003-10-25</entry>
      <modified>2003-10-25</modified>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="ebdf65c7-2ca6-11d8-9355-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>qpopper format string vulnerability</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>qpopper</name>
        <range><lt>2.53_1</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>An authenticated user may trigger a format string
          vulnerability present in qpopper's UIDL code, resulting
          in arbitrary code execution with group ID `mail'
          privileges.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <bid>1241</bid>
      <cvename>CVE-2000-0442</cvename>
      <url>http://www.netsys.com/suse-linux-security/2000-May/att-0137/01-b0f5-Qpopper.txt</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2000-05-23</discovery>
      <entry>2003-12-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

  <vuln vid="42c50e16-5ce8-11d8-80e3-0020ed76ef5a">
    <topic>Vulnerable test port</topic>
    <affects>
      <package>
        <name>vulnerability-test-port</name>
        <range><lt>2004.02.12</lt></range>
      </package>
    </affects>
    <description>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <p>This is a test entry.</p>
      </body>
    </description>
    <references>
      <url>http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/security/vulnerability-test-port/</url>
    </references>
    <dates>
      <discovery>2004-02-12</discovery>
      <entry>2004-02-12</entry>
    </dates>
  </vuln>

</vuxml>