aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/packages/order-utils/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJacob Evans <jacob@dekz.net>2018-08-13 10:23:29 +0800
committerJacob Evans <jacob@dekz.net>2018-08-15 11:06:32 +0800
commit622509c508272790e3e69c09cf1a1f9696815147 (patch)
tree0a86370cc0e02a2ede06e48baa5ad123d0617276 /packages/order-utils/test
parentf9f232f5d9527926cd64027f69491b0bc6e58894 (diff)
downloaddexon-sol-tools-622509c508272790e3e69c09cf1a1f9696815147.tar.gz
dexon-sol-tools-622509c508272790e3e69c09cf1a1f9696815147.tar.zst
dexon-sol-tools-622509c508272790e3e69c09cf1a1f9696815147.zip
[Order-utils] Order is valid when maker amount is very small
Previously our min fillable calculation would throw a rounding error when encountering a valid order (with a small maker amount). This was inconsistent with the on-chain logic which allowed this order to be filled.
Diffstat (limited to 'packages/order-utils/test')
-rw-r--r--packages/order-utils/test/order_state_utils_test.ts122
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/packages/order-utils/test/order_state_utils_test.ts b/packages/order-utils/test/order_state_utils_test.ts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9292c40a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/order-utils/test/order_state_utils_test.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+import { BigNumber } from '@0xproject/utils';
+import * as chai from 'chai';
+import 'mocha';
+
+import { AbstractBalanceAndProxyAllowanceFetcher, AbstractOrderFilledCancelledFetcher, OrderStateUtils } from '../src';
+
+import { chaiSetup } from './utils/chai_setup';
+import { testOrderFactory } from './utils/test_order_factory';
+
+chaiSetup.configure();
+const expect = chai.expect;
+
+describe('OrderStateUtils', () => {
+ describe('#getOpenOrderStateAsync', () => {
+ const buildMockBalanceFetcher = (takerBalance: BigNumber): AbstractBalanceAndProxyAllowanceFetcher => {
+ const balanceFetcher = {
+ async getBalanceAsync(_assetData: string, _userAddress: string): Promise<BigNumber> {
+ return takerBalance;
+ },
+ async getProxyAllowanceAsync(_assetData: string, _userAddress: string): Promise<BigNumber> {
+ return takerBalance;
+ },
+ };
+ return balanceFetcher;
+ };
+ const buildMockOrderFilledFetcher = (
+ filledAmount: BigNumber = new BigNumber(0),
+ cancelled: boolean = false,
+ ): AbstractOrderFilledCancelledFetcher => {
+ const orderFetcher = {
+ async getFilledTakerAmountAsync(_orderHash: string): Promise<BigNumber> {
+ return filledAmount;
+ },
+ async isOrderCancelledAsync(_orderHash: string): Promise<boolean> {
+ return cancelled;
+ },
+ getZRXAssetData(): string {
+ return '';
+ },
+ };
+ return orderFetcher;
+ };
+ it('should have valid order state if order can be fully filled with small maker amount', async () => {
+ const makerAssetAmount = new BigNumber(10);
+ const takerAssetAmount = new BigNumber(10000000000000000);
+ const takerBalance = takerAssetAmount;
+ const orderFilledAmount = new BigNumber(0);
+ const mockBalanceFetcher = buildMockBalanceFetcher(takerBalance);
+ const mockOrderFilledFetcher = buildMockOrderFilledFetcher(orderFilledAmount);
+ const [signedOrder] = testOrderFactory.generateTestSignedOrders(
+ {
+ makerAssetAmount,
+ takerAssetAmount,
+ },
+ 1,
+ );
+
+ const orderStateUtils = new OrderStateUtils(mockBalanceFetcher, mockOrderFilledFetcher);
+ const orderState = await orderStateUtils.getOpenOrderStateAsync(signedOrder);
+ expect(orderState.isValid).to.eq(true);
+ });
+ it('should be invalid when an order is partially filled where only a rounding error remains', async () => {
+ const makerAssetAmount = new BigNumber(1001);
+ const takerAssetAmount = new BigNumber(3);
+ const takerBalance = takerAssetAmount;
+ const orderFilledAmount = new BigNumber(2);
+ const mockBalanceFetcher = buildMockBalanceFetcher(takerBalance);
+ const mockOrderFilledFetcher = buildMockOrderFilledFetcher(orderFilledAmount);
+ const [signedOrder] = testOrderFactory.generateTestSignedOrders(
+ {
+ makerAssetAmount,
+ takerAssetAmount,
+ },
+ 1,
+ );
+
+ const orderStateUtils = new OrderStateUtils(mockBalanceFetcher, mockOrderFilledFetcher);
+ const orderState = await orderStateUtils.getOpenOrderStateAsync(signedOrder);
+ expect(orderState.isValid).to.eq(false);
+ });
+ it('should be invalid when an order is cancelled', async () => {
+ const makerAssetAmount = new BigNumber(1000);
+ const takerAssetAmount = new BigNumber(2);
+ const takerBalance = takerAssetAmount;
+ const orderFilledAmount = new BigNumber(0);
+ const isCancelled = true;
+ const mockBalanceFetcher = buildMockBalanceFetcher(takerBalance);
+ const mockOrderFilledFetcher = buildMockOrderFilledFetcher(orderFilledAmount, isCancelled);
+ const [signedOrder] = testOrderFactory.generateTestSignedOrders(
+ {
+ makerAssetAmount,
+ takerAssetAmount,
+ },
+ 1,
+ );
+
+ const orderStateUtils = new OrderStateUtils(mockBalanceFetcher, mockOrderFilledFetcher);
+ const orderState = await orderStateUtils.getOpenOrderStateAsync(signedOrder);
+ expect(orderState.isValid).to.eq(false);
+ });
+ it('should be invalid when an order is fully filled', async () => {
+ const makerAssetAmount = new BigNumber(1000);
+ const takerAssetAmount = new BigNumber(2);
+ const takerBalance = takerAssetAmount;
+ const orderFilledAmount = takerAssetAmount;
+ const isCancelled = false;
+ const mockBalanceFetcher = buildMockBalanceFetcher(takerBalance);
+ const mockOrderFilledFetcher = buildMockOrderFilledFetcher(orderFilledAmount, isCancelled);
+ const [signedOrder] = testOrderFactory.generateTestSignedOrders(
+ {
+ makerAssetAmount,
+ takerAssetAmount,
+ },
+ 1,
+ );
+
+ const orderStateUtils = new OrderStateUtils(mockBalanceFetcher, mockOrderFilledFetcher);
+ const orderState = await orderStateUtils.getOpenOrderStateAsync(signedOrder);
+ expect(orderState.isValid).to.eq(false);
+ });
+ });
+});