Reformat code

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 17 deletions

diff --git a/docs/security-considerations.rst b/docs/security-considerations.rst
index a96e58e9..726b8a2a 100644
--- a/docs/security-considerations.rst
+++ b/docs/security-considerations.rst
@@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ complete contract):
 
   // THIS CONTRACT CONTAINS A BUG - DO NOT USE
   contract Fund {
-    /// Mapping of ether shares of the contract.
-    mapping(address => uint) shares;
-    /// Withdraw your share.
-    function withdraw() {
-      if (msg.sender.send(shares[msg.sender]))
-        shares[msg.sender] = 0;
-    }
+      /// Mapping of ether shares of the contract.
+      mapping(address => uint) shares;
+      /// Withdraw your share.
+      function withdraw() {
+          if (msg.sender.send(shares[msg.sender]))
+              shares[msg.sender] = 0;
+      }
   }
 
 The problem is not too serious here because of the limited gas as part
@@ -71,18 +71,17 @@ outlined further below:
 ::
 
   contract Fund {
-    /// Mapping of ether shares of the contract.
-    mapping(address => uint) shares;
-    /// Withdraw your share.
-    function withdraw() {
-      var share = shares[msg.sender];
-      shares[msg.sender] = 0;
-      if (!msg.sender.send(share))
-        throw;
-    }
+      /// Mapping of ether shares of the contract.
+      mapping(address => uint) shares;
+      /// Withdraw your share.
+      function withdraw() {
+          var share = shares[msg.sender];
+          shares[msg.sender] = 0;
+          if (!msg.sender.send(share))
+              throw;
+      }
   }
 
-
 Note that re-entrancy is not only an effect of Ether transfer but of any
 function call on another contract. Furthermore, you also have to take
 multi-contract situations into account. A called contract could modify the