aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/libsolidity/codegen/ExpressionCompiler.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Kirchner <daniel@ekpyron.org>2018-06-07 23:08:42 +0800
committerAlex Beregszaszi <alex@rtfs.hu>2018-06-12 16:32:19 +0800
commite84b55bd6feded46789d2d398cd1b4092ef7a1c0 (patch)
tree2419d28fe6a58722007a56612b950397b8f2d64b /libsolidity/codegen/ExpressionCompiler.cpp
parentf33dc92cbd908a6d852368fa30144bda9e8da439 (diff)
downloaddexon-solidity-e84b55bd6feded46789d2d398cd1b4092ef7a1c0.tar.gz
dexon-solidity-e84b55bd6feded46789d2d398cd1b4092ef7a1c0.tar.zst
dexon-solidity-e84b55bd6feded46789d2d398cd1b4092ef7a1c0.zip
Extend explanatory remark and argue using bitwise operations instead of rounding.
Diffstat (limited to 'libsolidity/codegen/ExpressionCompiler.cpp')
-rw-r--r--libsolidity/codegen/ExpressionCompiler.cpp20
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/libsolidity/codegen/ExpressionCompiler.cpp b/libsolidity/codegen/ExpressionCompiler.cpp
index 908c703a..0470c3ec 100644
--- a/libsolidity/codegen/ExpressionCompiler.cpp
+++ b/libsolidity/codegen/ExpressionCompiler.cpp
@@ -1742,12 +1742,20 @@ void ExpressionCompiler::appendShiftOperatorCode(Token::Value _operator, Type co
else
{
if (c_valueSigned)
- // For negative values xor_mask has all bits set and xor(value_to_shift, xor_mask) will be
- // the bitwise complement of value_to_shift, i.e. abs(value_to_shift) - 1. Dividing this by
- // exp(2, shift_amount) results in a value that is positive and strictly smaller than the
- // absolute value of the desired result. Taking the complement again changes the sign
- // back to negative and subtracts one, resulting in rounding towards negative infinity.
- // For positive values xor_mask is zero and xor(value_to_shift, xor_mask) is again value_to_shift.
+ // In the following assembly snippet, xor_mask will be zero, if value_to_shift is positive.
+ // Therefor xor'ing with xor_mask is the identity and the computation reduces to
+ // div(value_to_shift, exp(2, shift_amount)), which is correct, since for positive values
+ // arithmetic right shift is dividing by a power of two (which, as a bitwise operation, results
+ // in discarding bits on the right and filling with zeros from the left).
+ // For negative values arithmetic right shift, viewed as a bitwise operation, discards bits to the
+ // right and fills in ones from the left. This is achieved as follows:
+ // If value_to_shift is negative, then xor_mask will have all bits set, so xor'ing with xor_mask
+ // will flip all bits. First all bits in value_to_shift are flipped. As for the positive case,
+ // dividing by a power of two using integer arithmetic results in discarding bits to the right
+ // and filling with zeros from the left. Flipping all bits in the result again, turns all zeros
+ // on the left to ones and restores the non-discarded, shifted bits to their original value (they
+ // have now been flipped twice). In summary we now have discarded bits to the right and filled with
+ // ones from the left, i.e. we have performed an arithmetic right shift.
m_context.appendInlineAssembly(R"({
let xor_mask := sub(0, slt(value_to_shift, 0))
value_to_shift := xor(div(xor(value_to_shift, xor_mask), exp(2, shift_amount)), xor_mask)