aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/accounts/abi/argument.go
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorprotolambda <proto@protolambda.com>2018-03-05 06:24:17 +0800
committerGuillaume Ballet <gballet@gmail.com>2018-03-05 06:24:17 +0800
commit0b814d32f8737b194874942f11dc3e9e7399cf7b (patch)
treef20a7027440eda147c88a659164de0b8087e29af /accounts/abi/argument.go
parent7b1d6370983d38faee944934e1c2b01bd04e0634 (diff)
downloaddexon-0b814d32f8737b194874942f11dc3e9e7399cf7b.tar.gz
dexon-0b814d32f8737b194874942f11dc3e9e7399cf7b.tar.zst
dexon-0b814d32f8737b194874942f11dc3e9e7399cf7b.zip
accounts/abi: Abi binding support for nested arrays, fixes #15648, including nested array unpack fix (#15676)
* accounts/abi/bind: support for multi-dim arrays Also: - reduce usage of regexes a bit. - fix minor Java syntax problems Fixes #15648 * accounts/abi/bind: Add some more documentation * accounts/abi/bind: Improve code readability * accounts/abi: bugfix for unpacking nested arrays The code previously assumed the arrays/slices were always 1 level deep. While the packing supports nested arrays (!!!). The current code for unpacking doesn't return the "consumed" length, so this fix had to work around that by calculating it (i.e. packing and getting resulting length) after the unpacking of the array element. It's far from ideal, but unpacking behaviour is fixed now. * accounts/abi: Fix unpacking of nested arrays Removed the temporary workaround of packing to calculate size, which was incorrect for slice-like types anyway. Full size of nested arrays is used now. * accounts/abi: deeply nested array unpack test Test unpacking of an array nested more than one level. * accounts/abi: Add deeply nested array pack test Same as the deep nested array unpack test, but the other way around. * accounts/abi/bind: deeply nested arrays bind test Test the usage of bindings that were generated for methods with multi-dimensional (and not just a single extra dimension, like foo[2][3]) array arguments and returns. edit: trigger rebuild, CI failed to fetch linter module. * accounts/abi/bind: improve array binding wrapArray uses a regex now, and arrayBindingJava is improved. * accounts/abi: Improve naming of element size func The full step size for unpacking an array is now retrieved with "getFullElemSize". * accounts/abi: support nested nested array args Previously, the code only considered the outer-size of the array, ignoring the size of the contents. This was fine for most types, but nested arrays are packed directly into it, and count towards the total size. This resulted in arguments following a nested array to replicate some of the binary contents of the array. The fix: for arrays, calculate their complete contents size: count the arg.Type.Elem.Size when Elem is an Array, and repeat when their child is an array too, etc. The count is the number of 32 byte elements, similar to how it previously counted, but nested. * accounts/abi: Test deep nested arr multi-arguments Arguments with a deeply nested array should not cause the next arguments to be read from the wrong position.
Diffstat (limited to 'accounts/abi/argument.go')
-rw-r--r--accounts/abi/argument.go26
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/accounts/abi/argument.go b/accounts/abi/argument.go
index f171f4cc6..1b480da60 100644
--- a/accounts/abi/argument.go
+++ b/accounts/abi/argument.go
@@ -169,6 +169,21 @@ func (arguments Arguments) unpackAtomic(v interface{}, marshalledValues []interf
return set(elem, reflectValue, arguments.NonIndexed()[0])
}
+// Computes the full size of an array;
+// i.e. counting nested arrays, which count towards size for unpacking.
+func getArraySize(arr *Type) int {
+ size := arr.Size
+ // Arrays can be nested, with each element being the same size
+ arr = arr.Elem
+ for arr.T == ArrayTy {
+ // Keep multiplying by elem.Size while the elem is an array.
+ size *= arr.Size
+ arr = arr.Elem
+ }
+ // Now we have the full array size, including its children.
+ return size
+}
+
// UnpackValues can be used to unpack ABI-encoded hexdata according to the ABI-specification,
// without supplying a struct to unpack into. Instead, this method returns a list containing the
// values. An atomic argument will be a list with one element.
@@ -181,9 +196,14 @@ func (arguments Arguments) UnpackValues(data []byte) ([]interface{}, error) {
// If we have a static array, like [3]uint256, these are coded as
// just like uint256,uint256,uint256.
// This means that we need to add two 'virtual' arguments when
- // we count the index from now on
-
- virtualArgs += arg.Type.Size - 1
+ // we count the index from now on.
+ //
+ // Array values nested multiple levels deep are also encoded inline:
+ // [2][3]uint256: uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256
+ //
+ // Calculate the full array size to get the correct offset for the next argument.
+ // Decrement it by 1, as the normal index increment is still applied.
+ virtualArgs += getArraySize(&arg.Type) - 1
}
if err != nil {
return nil, err