aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/eth/downloader/downloader_test.go
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'eth/downloader/downloader_test.go')
-rw-r--r--eth/downloader/downloader_test.go649
1 files changed, 227 insertions, 422 deletions
diff --git a/eth/downloader/downloader_test.go b/eth/downloader/downloader_test.go
index 61fc7827b..8d009b671 100644
--- a/eth/downloader/downloader_test.go
+++ b/eth/downloader/downloader_test.go
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
package downloader
import (
- "crypto/rand"
"errors"
"fmt"
"math/big"
@@ -28,20 +27,39 @@ import (
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/core"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/core/types"
+ "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/crypto"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/ethdb"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/event"
+ "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/params"
)
var (
- testdb, _ = ethdb.NewMemDatabase()
- genesis = core.GenesisBlockForTesting(testdb, common.Address{}, big.NewInt(0))
+ testdb, _ = ethdb.NewMemDatabase()
+ testKey, _ = crypto.HexToECDSA("b71c71a67e1177ad4e901695e1b4b9ee17ae16c6668d313eac2f96dbcda3f291")
+ testAddress = crypto.PubkeyToAddress(testKey.PublicKey)
+ genesis = core.GenesisBlockForTesting(testdb, testAddress, big.NewInt(1000000000))
)
-// makeChain creates a chain of n blocks starting at but not including
-// parent. the returned hash chain is ordered head->parent.
+// makeChain creates a chain of n blocks starting at and including parent.
+// the returned hash chain is ordered head->parent. In addition, every 3rd block
+// contains a transaction and every 5th an uncle to allow testing correct block
+// reassembly.
func makeChain(n int, seed byte, parent *types.Block) ([]common.Hash, map[common.Hash]*types.Block) {
- blocks := core.GenerateChain(parent, testdb, n, func(i int, gen *core.BlockGen) {
- gen.SetCoinbase(common.Address{seed})
+ blocks := core.GenerateChain(parent, testdb, n, func(i int, block *core.BlockGen) {
+ block.SetCoinbase(common.Address{seed})
+
+ // If the block number is multiple of 3, send a bonus transaction to the miner
+ if parent == genesis && i%3 == 0 {
+ tx, err := types.NewTransaction(block.TxNonce(testAddress), common.Address{seed}, big.NewInt(1000), params.TxGas, nil, nil).SignECDSA(testKey)
+ if err != nil {
+ panic(err)
+ }
+ block.AddTx(tx)
+ }
+ // If the block number is a multiple of 5, add a bonus uncle to the block
+ if i%5 == 0 {
+ block.AddUncle(&types.Header{ParentHash: block.PrevBlock(i - 1).Hash(), Number: big.NewInt(int64(i - 1))})
+ }
})
hashes := make([]common.Hash, n+1)
hashes[len(hashes)-1] = parent.Hash()
@@ -79,8 +97,6 @@ type downloadTester struct {
ownBlocks map[common.Hash]*types.Block // Blocks belonging to the tester
peerHashes map[string][]common.Hash // Hash chain belonging to different test peers
peerBlocks map[string]map[common.Hash]*types.Block // Blocks belonging to different test peers
-
- maxHashFetch int // Overrides the maximum number of retrieved hashes
}
// newTester creates a new downloader test mocker.
@@ -157,7 +173,9 @@ func (dl *downloadTester) newPeer(id string, version int, hashes []common.Hash,
// specific delay time on processing the network packets sent to it, simulating
// potentially slow network IO.
func (dl *downloadTester) newSlowPeer(id string, version int, hashes []common.Hash, blocks map[common.Hash]*types.Block, delay time.Duration) error {
- err := dl.downloader.RegisterPeer(id, version, hashes[0], dl.peerGetRelHashesFn(id, delay), dl.peerGetAbsHashesFn(id, version, delay), dl.peerGetBlocksFn(id, delay))
+ err := dl.downloader.RegisterPeer(id, version, hashes[0],
+ dl.peerGetRelHashesFn(id, delay), dl.peerGetAbsHashesFn(id, delay), dl.peerGetBlocksFn(id, delay),
+ nil, dl.peerGetAbsHeadersFn(id, delay), dl.peerGetBodiesFn(id, delay))
if err == nil {
// Assign the owned hashes and blocks to the peer (deep copy)
dl.peerHashes[id] = make([]common.Hash, len(hashes))
@@ -185,13 +203,9 @@ func (dl *downloadTester) peerGetRelHashesFn(id string, delay time.Duration) fun
return func(head common.Hash) error {
time.Sleep(delay)
- limit := MaxHashFetch
- if dl.maxHashFetch > 0 {
- limit = dl.maxHashFetch
- }
// Gather the next batch of hashes
hashes := dl.peerHashes[id]
- result := make([]common.Hash, 0, limit)
+ result := make([]common.Hash, 0, MaxHashFetch)
for i, hash := range hashes {
if hash == head {
i++
@@ -205,7 +219,7 @@ func (dl *downloadTester) peerGetRelHashesFn(id string, delay time.Duration) fun
// Delay delivery a bit to allow attacks to unfold
go func() {
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
- dl.downloader.DeliverHashes(id, result)
+ dl.downloader.DeliverHashes61(id, result)
}()
return nil
}
@@ -214,29 +228,20 @@ func (dl *downloadTester) peerGetRelHashesFn(id string, delay time.Duration) fun
// peerGetAbsHashesFn constructs a GetHashesFromNumber function associated with
// a particular peer in the download tester. The returned function can be used to
// retrieve batches of hashes from the particularly requested peer.
-func (dl *downloadTester) peerGetAbsHashesFn(id string, version int, delay time.Duration) func(uint64, int) error {
- // If the simulated peer runs eth/60, this message is not supported
- if version == eth60 {
- return func(uint64, int) error { return nil }
- }
- // Otherwise create a method to request the blocks by number
+func (dl *downloadTester) peerGetAbsHashesFn(id string, delay time.Duration) func(uint64, int) error {
return func(head uint64, count int) error {
time.Sleep(delay)
- limit := count
- if dl.maxHashFetch > 0 {
- limit = dl.maxHashFetch
- }
// Gather the next batch of hashes
hashes := dl.peerHashes[id]
- result := make([]common.Hash, 0, limit)
- for i := 0; i < limit && len(hashes)-int(head)-1-i >= 0; i++ {
+ result := make([]common.Hash, 0, count)
+ for i := 0; i < count && len(hashes)-int(head)-1-i >= 0; i++ {
result = append(result, hashes[len(hashes)-int(head)-1-i])
}
// Delay delivery a bit to allow attacks to unfold
go func() {
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
- dl.downloader.DeliverHashes(id, result)
+ dl.downloader.DeliverHashes61(id, result)
}()
return nil
}
@@ -255,40 +260,75 @@ func (dl *downloadTester) peerGetBlocksFn(id string, delay time.Duration) func([
result = append(result, block)
}
}
- go dl.downloader.DeliverBlocks(id, result)
+ go dl.downloader.DeliverBlocks61(id, result)
return nil
}
}
-// Tests that simple synchronization, without throttling from a good peer works.
-func TestSynchronisation60(t *testing.T) {
- // Create a small enough block chain to download and the tester
- targetBlocks := blockCacheLimit - 15
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
-
- tester := newTester()
- tester.newPeer("peer", eth60, hashes, blocks)
+// peerGetAbsHeadersFn constructs a GetBlockHeaders function based on a numbered
+// origin; associated with a particular peer in the download tester. The returned
+// function can be used to retrieve batches of headers from the particular peer.
+func (dl *downloadTester) peerGetAbsHeadersFn(id string, delay time.Duration) func(uint64, int, int, bool) error {
+ return func(origin uint64, amount int, skip int, reverse bool) error {
+ time.Sleep(delay)
- // Synchronise with the peer and make sure all blocks were retrieved
- if err := tester.sync("peer", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
+ // Gather the next batch of hashes
+ hashes := dl.peerHashes[id]
+ blocks := dl.peerBlocks[id]
+ result := make([]*types.Header, 0, amount)
+ for i := 0; i < amount && len(hashes)-int(origin)-1-i >= 0; i++ {
+ if block, ok := blocks[hashes[len(hashes)-int(origin)-1-i]]; ok {
+ result = append(result, block.Header())
+ }
+ }
+ // Delay delivery a bit to allow attacks to unfold
+ go func() {
+ time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
+ dl.downloader.DeliverHeaders(id, result)
+ }()
+ return nil
}
- if imported := len(tester.ownBlocks); imported != targetBlocks+1 {
- t.Fatalf("synchronised block mismatch: have %v, want %v", imported, targetBlocks+1)
+}
+
+// peerGetBodiesFn constructs a getBlockBodies method associated with a particular
+// peer in the download tester. The returned function can be used to retrieve
+// batches of block bodies from the particularly requested peer.
+func (dl *downloadTester) peerGetBodiesFn(id string, delay time.Duration) func([]common.Hash) error {
+ return func(hashes []common.Hash) error {
+ time.Sleep(delay)
+ blocks := dl.peerBlocks[id]
+
+ transactions := make([][]*types.Transaction, 0, len(hashes))
+ uncles := make([][]*types.Header, 0, len(hashes))
+
+ for _, hash := range hashes {
+ if block, ok := blocks[hash]; ok {
+ transactions = append(transactions, block.Transactions())
+ uncles = append(uncles, block.Uncles())
+ }
+ }
+ go dl.downloader.DeliverBodies(id, transactions, uncles)
+
+ return nil
}
}
// Tests that simple synchronization against a canonical chain works correctly.
// In this test common ancestor lookup should be short circuited and not require
// binary searching.
-func TestCanonicalSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) {
+func TestCanonicalSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) { testCanonicalSynchronisation(t, 61) }
+func TestCanonicalSynchronisation62(t *testing.T) { testCanonicalSynchronisation(t, 62) }
+func TestCanonicalSynchronisation63(t *testing.T) { testCanonicalSynchronisation(t, 63) }
+func TestCanonicalSynchronisation64(t *testing.T) { testCanonicalSynchronisation(t, 64) }
+
+func testCanonicalSynchronisation(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Create a small enough block chain to download
targetBlocks := blockCacheLimit - 15
hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
tester := newTester()
- tester.newPeer("peer", eth61, hashes, blocks)
+ tester.newPeer("peer", protocol, hashes, blocks)
// Synchronise with the peer and make sure all blocks were retrieved
if err := tester.sync("peer", nil); err != nil {
@@ -301,8 +341,10 @@ func TestCanonicalSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) {
// Tests that if a large batch of blocks are being downloaded, it is throttled
// until the cached blocks are retrieved.
-func TestThrottling60(t *testing.T) { testThrottling(t, eth60) }
-func TestThrottling61(t *testing.T) { testThrottling(t, eth61) }
+func TestThrottling61(t *testing.T) { testThrottling(t, 61) }
+func TestThrottling62(t *testing.T) { testThrottling(t, 62) }
+func TestThrottling63(t *testing.T) { testThrottling(t, 63) }
+func TestThrottling64(t *testing.T) { testThrottling(t, 64) }
func testThrottling(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Create a long block chain to download and the tester
@@ -313,11 +355,10 @@ func testThrottling(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
tester.newPeer("peer", protocol, hashes, blocks)
// Wrap the importer to allow stepping
- done := make(chan int)
- tester.downloader.insertChain = func(blocks types.Blocks) (int, error) {
- n, err := tester.insertChain(blocks)
- done <- n
- return n, err
+ blocked, proceed := uint32(0), make(chan struct{})
+ tester.downloader.chainInsertHook = func(blocks []*Block) {
+ atomic.StoreUint32(&blocked, uint32(len(blocks)))
+ <-proceed
}
// Start a synchronisation concurrently
errc := make(chan error)
@@ -328,27 +369,25 @@ func testThrottling(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
for len(tester.ownBlocks) < targetBlocks+1 {
// Wait a bit for sync to throttle itself
var cached int
- for start := time.Now(); time.Since(start) < 3*time.Second; {
+ for start := time.Now(); time.Since(start) < time.Second; {
time.Sleep(25 * time.Millisecond)
cached = len(tester.downloader.queue.blockPool)
- if cached == blockCacheLimit || len(tester.ownBlocks)+cached == targetBlocks+1 {
+ if cached == blockCacheLimit || len(tester.ownBlocks)+cached+int(atomic.LoadUint32(&blocked)) == targetBlocks+1 {
break
}
}
// Make sure we filled up the cache, then exhaust it
time.Sleep(25 * time.Millisecond) // give it a chance to screw up
- if cached != blockCacheLimit && len(tester.ownBlocks)+cached < targetBlocks+1 {
- t.Fatalf("block count mismatch: have %v, want %v", cached, blockCacheLimit)
+ if cached != blockCacheLimit && len(tester.ownBlocks)+cached+int(atomic.LoadUint32(&blocked)) != targetBlocks+1 {
+ t.Fatalf("block count mismatch: have %v, want %v (owned %v, target %v)", cached, blockCacheLimit, len(tester.ownBlocks), targetBlocks+1)
}
- <-done // finish previous blocking import
- for cached > maxBlockProcess {
- cached -= <-done
+ // Permit the blocked blocks to import
+ if atomic.LoadUint32(&blocked) > 0 {
+ atomic.StoreUint32(&blocked, uint32(0))
+ proceed <- struct{}{}
}
- time.Sleep(25 * time.Millisecond) // yield to the insertion
}
- <-done // finish the last blocking import
-
// Check that we haven't pulled more blocks than available
if len(tester.ownBlocks) > targetBlocks+1 {
t.Fatalf("target block count mismatch: have %v, want %v", len(tester.ownBlocks), targetBlocks+1)
@@ -361,14 +400,19 @@ func testThrottling(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Tests that simple synchronization against a forked chain works correctly. In
// this test common ancestor lookup should *not* be short circuited, and a full
// binary search should be executed.
-func TestForkedSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) {
+func TestForkedSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) { testForkedSynchronisation(t, 61) }
+func TestForkedSynchronisation62(t *testing.T) { testForkedSynchronisation(t, 62) }
+func TestForkedSynchronisation63(t *testing.T) { testForkedSynchronisation(t, 63) }
+func TestForkedSynchronisation64(t *testing.T) { testForkedSynchronisation(t, 64) }
+
+func testForkedSynchronisation(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Create a long enough forked chain
common, fork := MaxHashFetch, 2*MaxHashFetch
hashesA, hashesB, blocksA, blocksB := makeChainFork(common+fork, fork, genesis)
tester := newTester()
- tester.newPeer("fork A", eth61, hashesA, blocksA)
- tester.newPeer("fork B", eth61, hashesB, blocksB)
+ tester.newPeer("fork A", protocol, hashesA, blocksA)
+ tester.newPeer("fork B", protocol, hashesB, blocksB)
// Synchronise with the peer and make sure all blocks were retrieved
if err := tester.sync("fork A", nil); err != nil {
@@ -387,21 +431,36 @@ func TestForkedSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) {
}
// Tests that an inactive downloader will not accept incoming hashes and blocks.
-func TestInactiveDownloader(t *testing.T) {
+func TestInactiveDownloader61(t *testing.T) {
tester := newTester()
// Check that neither hashes nor blocks are accepted
- if err := tester.downloader.DeliverHashes("bad peer", []common.Hash{}); err != errNoSyncActive {
+ if err := tester.downloader.DeliverHashes61("bad peer", []common.Hash{}); err != errNoSyncActive {
t.Errorf("error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errNoSyncActive)
}
- if err := tester.downloader.DeliverBlocks("bad peer", []*types.Block{}); err != errNoSyncActive {
+ if err := tester.downloader.DeliverBlocks61("bad peer", []*types.Block{}); err != errNoSyncActive {
+ t.Errorf("error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errNoSyncActive)
+ }
+}
+
+// Tests that an inactive downloader will not accept incoming block headers and bodies.
+func TestInactiveDownloader62(t *testing.T) {
+ tester := newTester()
+
+ // Check that neither block headers nor bodies are accepted
+ if err := tester.downloader.DeliverHeaders("bad peer", []*types.Header{}); err != errNoSyncActive {
+ t.Errorf("error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errNoSyncActive)
+ }
+ if err := tester.downloader.DeliverBodies("bad peer", [][]*types.Transaction{}, [][]*types.Header{}); err != errNoSyncActive {
t.Errorf("error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errNoSyncActive)
}
}
// Tests that a canceled download wipes all previously accumulated state.
-func TestCancel60(t *testing.T) { testCancel(t, eth60) }
-func TestCancel61(t *testing.T) { testCancel(t, eth61) }
+func TestCancel61(t *testing.T) { testCancel(t, 61) }
+func TestCancel62(t *testing.T) { testCancel(t, 62) }
+func TestCancel63(t *testing.T) { testCancel(t, 63) }
+func TestCancel64(t *testing.T) { testCancel(t, 64) }
func testCancel(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Create a small enough block chain to download and the tester
@@ -409,6 +468,9 @@ func testCancel(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
if targetBlocks >= MaxHashFetch {
targetBlocks = MaxHashFetch - 15
}
+ if targetBlocks >= MaxHeaderFetch {
+ targetBlocks = MaxHeaderFetch - 15
+ }
hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
tester := newTester()
@@ -416,28 +478,30 @@ func testCancel(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Make sure canceling works with a pristine downloader
tester.downloader.cancel()
- hashCount, blockCount := tester.downloader.queue.Size()
- if hashCount > 0 || blockCount > 0 {
- t.Errorf("block or hash count mismatch: %d hashes, %d blocks, want 0", hashCount, blockCount)
+ downloading, importing := tester.downloader.queue.Size()
+ if downloading > 0 || importing > 0 {
+ t.Errorf("download or import count mismatch: %d downloading, %d importing, want 0", downloading, importing)
}
// Synchronise with the peer, but cancel afterwards
if err := tester.sync("peer", nil); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
}
tester.downloader.cancel()
- hashCount, blockCount = tester.downloader.queue.Size()
- if hashCount > 0 || blockCount > 0 {
- t.Errorf("block or hash count mismatch: %d hashes, %d blocks, want 0", hashCount, blockCount)
+ downloading, importing = tester.downloader.queue.Size()
+ if downloading > 0 || importing > 0 {
+ t.Errorf("download or import count mismatch: %d downloading, %d importing, want 0", downloading, importing)
}
}
// Tests that synchronisation from multiple peers works as intended (multi thread sanity test).
-func TestMultiSynchronisation60(t *testing.T) { testMultiSynchronisation(t, eth60) }
-func TestMultiSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) { testMultiSynchronisation(t, eth61) }
+func TestMultiSynchronisation61(t *testing.T) { testMultiSynchronisation(t, 61) }
+func TestMultiSynchronisation62(t *testing.T) { testMultiSynchronisation(t, 62) }
+func TestMultiSynchronisation63(t *testing.T) { testMultiSynchronisation(t, 63) }
+func TestMultiSynchronisation64(t *testing.T) { testMultiSynchronisation(t, 64) }
func testMultiSynchronisation(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Create various peers with various parts of the chain
- targetPeers := 16
+ targetPeers := 8
targetBlocks := targetPeers*blockCacheLimit - 15
hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
@@ -463,394 +527,130 @@ func testMultiSynchronisation(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
}
}
-// Tests that synchronising with a peer who's very slow at network IO does not
-// stall the other peers in the system.
-func TestSlowSynchronisation60(t *testing.T) {
- tester := newTester()
+// Tests that if a block is empty (i.e. header only), no body request should be
+// made, and instead the header should be assembled into a whole block in itself.
+func TestEmptyBlockShortCircuit62(t *testing.T) { testEmptyBlockShortCircuit(t, 62) }
+func TestEmptyBlockShortCircuit63(t *testing.T) { testEmptyBlockShortCircuit(t, 63) }
+func TestEmptyBlockShortCircuit64(t *testing.T) { testEmptyBlockShortCircuit(t, 64) }
- // Create a batch of blocks, with a slow and a full speed peer
- targetCycles := 2
- targetBlocks := targetCycles*blockCacheLimit - 15
- targetIODelay := time.Second
+func testEmptyBlockShortCircuit(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
+ // Create a small enough block chain to download
+ targetBlocks := blockCacheLimit - 15
hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
- tester.newSlowPeer("fast", eth60, hashes, blocks, 0)
- tester.newSlowPeer("slow", eth60, hashes, blocks, targetIODelay)
-
- // Try to sync with the peers (pull hashes from fast)
- start := time.Now()
- if err := tester.sync("fast", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
- }
- if imported := len(tester.ownBlocks); imported != targetBlocks+1 {
- t.Fatalf("synchronised block mismatch: have %v, want %v", imported, targetBlocks+1)
- }
- // Check that the slow peer got hit at most once per block-cache-size import
- limit := time.Duration(targetCycles+1) * targetIODelay
- if delay := time.Since(start); delay >= limit {
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation exceeded delay limit: have %v, want %v", delay, limit)
- }
-}
-
-// Tests that if a peer returns an invalid chain with a block pointing to a non-
-// existing parent, it is correctly detected and handled.
-func TestNonExistingParentAttack60(t *testing.T) {
tester := newTester()
+ tester.newPeer("peer", protocol, hashes, blocks)
- // Forge a single-link chain with a forged header
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(1, 0, genesis)
- tester.newPeer("valid", eth60, hashes, blocks)
-
- wrongblock := types.NewBlock(&types.Header{}, nil, nil, nil)
- wrongblock.Td = blocks[hashes[0]].Td
- hashes, blocks = makeChain(1, 0, wrongblock)
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, hashes, blocks)
-
- // Try and sync with the malicious node and check that it fails
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err == nil {
- t.Fatalf("block synchronization succeeded")
- }
- if tester.hasBlock(hashes[0]) {
- t.Fatalf("tester accepted unknown-parent block: %v", blocks[hashes[0]])
+ // Instrument the downloader to signal body requests
+ requested := int32(0)
+ tester.downloader.bodyFetchHook = func(headers []*types.Header) {
+ atomic.AddInt32(&requested, int32(len(headers)))
}
- // Try to synchronize with the valid chain and make sure it succeeds
- if err := tester.sync("valid", nil); err != nil {
+ // Synchronise with the peer and make sure all blocks were retrieved
+ if err := tester.sync("peer", nil); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
}
- if !tester.hasBlock(tester.peerHashes["valid"][0]) {
- t.Fatalf("tester didn't accept known-parent block: %v", tester.peerBlocks["valid"][hashes[0]])
+ if imported := len(tester.ownBlocks); imported != targetBlocks+1 {
+ t.Fatalf("synchronised block mismatch: have %v, want %v", imported, targetBlocks+1)
}
-}
-
-// Tests that if a malicious peers keeps sending us repeating hashes, we don't
-// loop indefinitely.
-func TestRepeatingHashAttack60(t *testing.T) { // TODO: Is this thing valid??
- tester := newTester()
-
- // Create a valid chain, but drop the last link
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(blockCacheLimit, 0, genesis)
- tester.newPeer("valid", eth60, hashes, blocks)
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, hashes[:len(hashes)-1], blocks)
-
- // Try and sync with the malicious node
- errc := make(chan error)
- go func() {
- errc <- tester.sync("attack", nil)
- }()
- // Make sure that syncing returns and does so with a failure
- select {
- case <-time.After(time.Second):
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation blocked")
- case err := <-errc:
- if err == nil {
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation succeeded")
+ // Validate the number of block bodies that should have been requested
+ needed := 0
+ for _, block := range blocks {
+ if block != genesis && (len(block.Transactions()) > 0 || len(block.Uncles()) > 0) {
+ needed++
}
}
- // Ensure that a valid chain can still pass sync
- if err := tester.sync("valid", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
+ if int(requested) != needed {
+ t.Fatalf("block body retrieval count mismatch: have %v, want %v", requested, needed)
}
}
-// Tests that if a malicious peers returns a non-existent block hash, it should
-// eventually time out and the sync reattempted.
-func TestNonExistingBlockAttack60(t *testing.T) {
- tester := newTester()
+// Tests that if a peer sends an invalid body for a requested block, it gets
+// dropped immediately by the downloader.
+func TestInvalidBlockBodyAttack62(t *testing.T) { testInvalidBlockBodyAttack(t, 62) }
+func TestInvalidBlockBodyAttack63(t *testing.T) { testInvalidBlockBodyAttack(t, 63) }
+func TestInvalidBlockBodyAttack64(t *testing.T) { testInvalidBlockBodyAttack(t, 64) }
- // Create a valid chain, but forge the last link
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(blockCacheLimit, 0, genesis)
- tester.newPeer("valid", eth60, hashes, blocks)
+func testInvalidBlockBodyAttack(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
+ // Create two peers, one feeding invalid block bodies
+ targetBlocks := 4*blockCacheLimit - 15
+ hashes, validBlocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
- hashes[len(hashes)/2] = common.Hash{}
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, hashes, blocks)
-
- // Try and sync with the malicious node and check that it fails
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err != errPeersUnavailable {
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errPeersUnavailable)
- }
- // Ensure that a valid chain can still pass sync
- if err := tester.sync("valid", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
- }
-}
-
-// Tests that if a malicious peer is returning hashes in a weird order, that the
-// sync throttler doesn't choke on them waiting for the valid blocks.
-func TestInvalidHashOrderAttack60(t *testing.T) {
- tester := newTester()
-
- // Create a valid long chain, but reverse some hashes within
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(4*blockCacheLimit, 0, genesis)
- tester.newPeer("valid", eth60, hashes, blocks)
-
- chunk1 := make([]common.Hash, blockCacheLimit)
- chunk2 := make([]common.Hash, blockCacheLimit)
- copy(chunk1, hashes[blockCacheLimit:2*blockCacheLimit])
- copy(chunk2, hashes[2*blockCacheLimit:3*blockCacheLimit])
-
- copy(hashes[2*blockCacheLimit:], chunk1)
- copy(hashes[blockCacheLimit:], chunk2)
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, hashes, blocks)
-
- // Try and sync with the malicious node and check that it fails
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err != errInvalidChain {
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errInvalidChain)
- }
- // Ensure that a valid chain can still pass sync
- if err := tester.sync("valid", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
- }
-}
-
-// Tests that if a malicious peer makes up a random hash chain and tries to push
-// indefinitely, it actually gets caught with it.
-func TestMadeupHashChainAttack60(t *testing.T) {
- tester := newTester()
- blockSoftTTL = 100 * time.Millisecond
- crossCheckCycle = 25 * time.Millisecond
-
- // Create a long chain of hashes without backing blocks
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(4*blockCacheLimit, 0, genesis)
-
- randomHashes := make([]common.Hash, 1024*blockCacheLimit)
- for i := range randomHashes {
- rand.Read(randomHashes[i][:])
- }
-
- tester.newPeer("valid", eth60, hashes, blocks)
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, randomHashes, nil)
-
- // Try and sync with the malicious node and check that it fails
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err != errCrossCheckFailed {
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errCrossCheckFailed)
- }
- // Ensure that a valid chain can still pass sync
- if err := tester.sync("valid", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
- }
-}
-
-// Tests that if a malicious peer makes up a random hash chain, and tries to push
-// indefinitely, one hash at a time, it actually gets caught with it. The reason
-// this is separate from the classical made up chain attack is that sending hashes
-// one by one prevents reliable block/parent verification.
-func TestMadeupHashChainDrippingAttack60(t *testing.T) {
- // Create a random chain of hashes to drip
- randomHashes := make([]common.Hash, 16*blockCacheLimit)
- for i := range randomHashes {
- rand.Read(randomHashes[i][:])
- }
- randomHashes[len(randomHashes)-1] = genesis.Hash()
- tester := newTester()
-
- // Try and sync with the attacker, one hash at a time
- tester.maxHashFetch = 1
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, randomHashes, nil)
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err != errStallingPeer {
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errStallingPeer)
- }
-}
-
-// Tests that if a malicious peer makes up a random block chain, and tried to
-// push indefinitely, it actually gets caught with it.
-func TestMadeupBlockChainAttack60(t *testing.T) {
- defaultBlockTTL := blockSoftTTL
- defaultCrossCheckCycle := crossCheckCycle
-
- blockSoftTTL = 100 * time.Millisecond
- crossCheckCycle = 25 * time.Millisecond
-
- // Create a long chain of blocks and simulate an invalid chain by dropping every second
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(16*blockCacheLimit, 0, genesis)
- gapped := make([]common.Hash, len(hashes)/2)
- for i := 0; i < len(gapped); i++ {
- gapped[i] = hashes[2*i]
- }
- // Try and sync with the malicious node and check that it fails
- tester := newTester()
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, gapped, blocks)
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err != errCrossCheckFailed {
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errCrossCheckFailed)
- }
- // Ensure that a valid chain can still pass sync
- blockSoftTTL = defaultBlockTTL
- crossCheckCycle = defaultCrossCheckCycle
-
- tester.newPeer("valid", eth60, hashes, blocks)
- if err := tester.sync("valid", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
- }
-}
-
-// Tests that if one/multiple malicious peers try to feed a banned blockchain to
-// the downloader, it will not keep refetching the same chain indefinitely, but
-// gradually block pieces of it, until its head is also blocked.
-func TestBannedChainStarvationAttack60(t *testing.T) {
- n := 8 * blockCacheLimit
- fork := n/2 - 23
- hashes, forkHashes, blocks, forkBlocks := makeChainFork(n, fork, genesis)
-
- // Create the tester and ban the selected hash.
- tester := newTester()
- tester.downloader.banned.Add(forkHashes[fork-1])
- tester.newPeer("valid", eth60, hashes, blocks)
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, forkHashes, forkBlocks)
-
- // Iteratively try to sync, and verify that the banned hash list grows until
- // the head of the invalid chain is blocked too.
- for banned := tester.downloader.banned.Size(); ; {
- // Try to sync with the attacker, check hash chain failure
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err != errInvalidChain {
- if tester.downloader.banned.Has(forkHashes[0]) && err == errBannedHead {
- break
- }
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errInvalidChain)
- }
- // Check that the ban list grew with at least 1 new item, or all banned
- bans := tester.downloader.banned.Size()
- if bans < banned+1 {
- t.Fatalf("ban count mismatch: have %v, want %v+", bans, banned+1)
- }
- banned = bans
- }
- // Check that after banning an entire chain, bad peers get dropped
- if err := tester.newPeer("new attacker", eth60, forkHashes, forkBlocks); err != errBannedHead {
- t.Fatalf("peer registration mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errBannedHead)
+ invalidBlocks := make(map[common.Hash]*types.Block)
+ for hash, block := range validBlocks {
+ invalidBlocks[hash] = types.NewBlockWithHeader(block.Header())
}
- if peer := tester.downloader.peers.Peer("new attacker"); peer != nil {
- t.Fatalf("banned attacker registered: %v", peer)
- }
- // Ensure that a valid chain can still pass sync
- if err := tester.sync("valid", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
- }
-}
-
-// Tests that if a peer sends excessively many/large invalid chains that are
-// gradually banned, it will have an upper limit on the consumed memory and also
-// the origin bad hashes will not be evacuated.
-func TestBannedChainMemoryExhaustionAttack60(t *testing.T) {
- // Construct a banned chain with more chunks than the ban limit
- n := 8 * blockCacheLimit
- fork := n/2 - 23
- hashes, forkHashes, blocks, forkBlocks := makeChainFork(n, fork, genesis)
- // Create the tester and ban the root hash of the fork.
tester := newTester()
- tester.downloader.banned.Add(forkHashes[fork-1])
-
- // Reduce the test size a bit
- defaultMaxBlockFetch := MaxBlockFetch
- defaultMaxBannedHashes := maxBannedHashes
-
- MaxBlockFetch = 4
- maxBannedHashes = 256
-
- tester.newPeer("valid", eth60, hashes, blocks)
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, forkHashes, forkBlocks)
-
- // Iteratively try to sync, and verify that the banned hash list grows until
- // the head of the invalid chain is blocked too.
- for {
- // Try to sync with the attacker, check hash chain failure
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err != errInvalidChain {
- t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errInvalidChain)
- }
- // Short circuit if the entire chain was banned.
- if tester.downloader.banned.Has(forkHashes[0]) {
- break
- }
- // Otherwise ensure we never exceed the memory allowance and the hard coded bans are untouched
- if bans := tester.downloader.banned.Size(); bans > maxBannedHashes {
- t.Fatalf("ban cap exceeded: have %v, want max %v", bans, maxBannedHashes)
- }
- for hash := range core.BadHashes {
- if !tester.downloader.banned.Has(hash) {
- t.Fatalf("hard coded ban evacuated: %x", hash)
- }
- }
- }
- // Ensure that a valid chain can still pass sync
- MaxBlockFetch = defaultMaxBlockFetch
- maxBannedHashes = defaultMaxBannedHashes
+ tester.newPeer("valid", protocol, hashes, validBlocks)
+ tester.newPeer("attack", protocol, hashes, invalidBlocks)
+ // Synchronise with the valid peer (will pull contents from the attacker too)
if err := tester.sync("valid", nil); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
}
-}
-
-// Tests a corner case (potential attack) where a peer delivers both good as well
-// as unrequested blocks to a hash request. This may trigger a different code
-// path than the fully correct or fully invalid delivery, potentially causing
-// internal state problems
-//
-// No, don't delete this test, it actually did happen!
-func TestOverlappingDeliveryAttack60(t *testing.T) {
- // Create an arbitrary batch of blocks ( < cache-size not to block)
- targetBlocks := blockCacheLimit - 23
- hashes, blocks := makeChain(targetBlocks, 0, genesis)
-
- // Register an attacker that always returns non-requested blocks too
- tester := newTester()
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth60, hashes, blocks)
-
- rawGetBlocks := tester.downloader.peers.Peer("attack").getBlocks
- tester.downloader.peers.Peer("attack").getBlocks = func(request []common.Hash) error {
- // Add a non requested hash the screw the delivery (genesis should be fine)
- return rawGetBlocks(append(request, hashes[0]))
- }
- // Test that synchronisation can complete, check for import success
- if err := tester.sync("attack", nil); err != nil {
- t.Fatalf("failed to synchronise blocks: %v", err)
+ if imported := len(tester.ownBlocks); imported != len(hashes) {
+ t.Fatalf("synchronised block mismatch: have %v, want %v", imported, len(hashes))
}
- start := time.Now()
- for len(tester.ownHashes) != len(hashes) && time.Since(start) < time.Second {
- time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond)
- }
- if len(tester.ownHashes) != len(hashes) {
- t.Fatalf("chain length mismatch: have %v, want %v", len(tester.ownHashes), len(hashes))
+ // Make sure the attacker was detected and dropped in the mean time
+ if _, ok := tester.peerHashes["attack"]; ok {
+ t.Fatalf("block body attacker not detected/dropped")
}
}
// Tests that a peer advertising an high TD doesn't get to stall the downloader
// afterwards by not sending any useful hashes.
-func TestHighTDStarvationAttack61(t *testing.T) {
+func TestHighTDStarvationAttack61(t *testing.T) { testHighTDStarvationAttack(t, 61) }
+func TestHighTDStarvationAttack62(t *testing.T) { testHighTDStarvationAttack(t, 62) }
+func TestHighTDStarvationAttack63(t *testing.T) { testHighTDStarvationAttack(t, 63) }
+func TestHighTDStarvationAttack64(t *testing.T) { testHighTDStarvationAttack(t, 64) }
+
+func testHighTDStarvationAttack(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
tester := newTester()
- tester.newPeer("attack", eth61, []common.Hash{genesis.Hash()}, nil)
+ hashes, blocks := makeChain(0, 0, genesis)
+
+ tester.newPeer("attack", protocol, []common.Hash{hashes[0]}, blocks)
if err := tester.sync("attack", big.NewInt(1000000)); err != errStallingPeer {
t.Fatalf("synchronisation error mismatch: have %v, want %v", err, errStallingPeer)
}
}
// Tests that misbehaving peers are disconnected, whilst behaving ones are not.
-func TestHashAttackerDropping(t *testing.T) {
+func TestBlockHeaderAttackerDropping61(t *testing.T) { testBlockHeaderAttackerDropping(t, 61) }
+func TestBlockHeaderAttackerDropping62(t *testing.T) { testBlockHeaderAttackerDropping(t, 62) }
+func TestBlockHeaderAttackerDropping63(t *testing.T) { testBlockHeaderAttackerDropping(t, 63) }
+func TestBlockHeaderAttackerDropping64(t *testing.T) { testBlockHeaderAttackerDropping(t, 64) }
+
+func testBlockHeaderAttackerDropping(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Define the disconnection requirement for individual hash fetch errors
tests := []struct {
result error
drop bool
}{
- {nil, false}, // Sync succeeded, all is well
- {errBusy, false}, // Sync is already in progress, no problem
- {errUnknownPeer, false}, // Peer is unknown, was already dropped, don't double drop
- {errBadPeer, true}, // Peer was deemed bad for some reason, drop it
- {errStallingPeer, true}, // Peer was detected to be stalling, drop it
- {errBannedHead, true}, // Peer's head hash is a known bad hash, drop it
- {errNoPeers, false}, // No peers to download from, soft race, no issue
- {errPendingQueue, false}, // There are blocks still cached, wait to exhaust, no issue
- {errTimeout, true}, // No hashes received in due time, drop the peer
- {errEmptyHashSet, true}, // No hashes were returned as a response, drop as it's a dead end
- {errPeersUnavailable, true}, // Nobody had the advertised blocks, drop the advertiser
- {errInvalidChain, true}, // Hash chain was detected as invalid, definitely drop
- {errCrossCheckFailed, true}, // Hash-origin failed to pass a block cross check, drop
- {errCancelHashFetch, false}, // Synchronisation was canceled, origin may be innocent, don't drop
- {errCancelBlockFetch, false}, // Synchronisation was canceled, origin may be innocent, don't drop
+ {nil, false}, // Sync succeeded, all is well
+ {errBusy, false}, // Sync is already in progress, no problem
+ {errUnknownPeer, false}, // Peer is unknown, was already dropped, don't double drop
+ {errBadPeer, true}, // Peer was deemed bad for some reason, drop it
+ {errStallingPeer, true}, // Peer was detected to be stalling, drop it
+ {errNoPeers, false}, // No peers to download from, soft race, no issue
+ {errPendingQueue, false}, // There are blocks still cached, wait to exhaust, no issue
+ {errTimeout, true}, // No hashes received in due time, drop the peer
+ {errEmptyHashSet, true}, // No hashes were returned as a response, drop as it's a dead end
+ {errEmptyHeaderSet, true}, // No headers were returned as a response, drop as it's a dead end
+ {errPeersUnavailable, true}, // Nobody had the advertised blocks, drop the advertiser
+ {errInvalidChain, true}, // Hash chain was detected as invalid, definitely drop
+ {errInvalidBody, false}, // A bad peer was detected, but not the sync origin
+ {errCancelHashFetch, false}, // Synchronisation was canceled, origin may be innocent, don't drop
+ {errCancelBlockFetch, false}, // Synchronisation was canceled, origin may be innocent, don't drop
+ {errCancelHeaderFetch, false}, // Synchronisation was canceled, origin may be innocent, don't drop
+ {errCancelBodyFetch, false}, // Synchronisation was canceled, origin may be innocent, don't drop
}
// Run the tests and check disconnection status
tester := newTester()
for i, tt := range tests {
// Register a new peer and ensure it's presence
id := fmt.Sprintf("test %d", i)
- if err := tester.newPeer(id, eth60, []common.Hash{genesis.Hash()}, nil); err != nil {
+ if err := tester.newPeer(id, protocol, []common.Hash{genesis.Hash()}, nil); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("test %d: failed to register new peer: %v", i, err)
}
if _, ok := tester.peerHashes[id]; !ok {
@@ -867,7 +667,12 @@ func TestHashAttackerDropping(t *testing.T) {
}
// Tests that feeding bad blocks will result in a peer drop.
-func TestBlockAttackerDropping(t *testing.T) {
+func TestBlockBodyAttackerDropping61(t *testing.T) { testBlockBodyAttackerDropping(t, 61) }
+func TestBlockBodyAttackerDropping62(t *testing.T) { testBlockBodyAttackerDropping(t, 62) }
+func TestBlockBodyAttackerDropping63(t *testing.T) { testBlockBodyAttackerDropping(t, 63) }
+func TestBlockBodyAttackerDropping64(t *testing.T) { testBlockBodyAttackerDropping(t, 64) }
+
+func testBlockBodyAttackerDropping(t *testing.T, protocol int) {
// Define the disconnection requirement for individual block import errors
tests := []struct {
failure bool
@@ -882,7 +687,7 @@ func TestBlockAttackerDropping(t *testing.T) {
for i, tt := range tests {
// Register a new peer and ensure it's presence
id := fmt.Sprintf("test %d", i)
- if err := tester.newPeer(id, eth60, []common.Hash{common.Hash{}}, nil); err != nil {
+ if err := tester.newPeer(id, protocol, []common.Hash{common.Hash{}}, nil); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("test %d: failed to register new peer: %v", i, err)
}
if _, ok := tester.peerHashes[id]; !ok {