diff options
author | Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj@ximian.com> | 2002-04-20 06:02:13 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj@src.gnome.org> | 2002-04-20 06:02:13 +0800 |
commit | ae9e80d9f3065b73de19ab01db27bd0b4860233a (patch) | |
tree | c3373cb239a94ac27708eb9dc4496417fb23d5c1 /camel/ChangeLog | |
parent | 4d1d5c599c774fbd2b3f4e2aadf41c38881d1f10 (diff) | |
download | gsoc2013-evolution-ae9e80d9f3065b73de19ab01db27bd0b4860233a.tar.gz gsoc2013-evolution-ae9e80d9f3065b73de19ab01db27bd0b4860233a.tar.zst gsoc2013-evolution-ae9e80d9f3065b73de19ab01db27bd0b4860233a.zip |
Don't g_return_val_if_fail here if the boundary is an empty string. See
2002-04-19 Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj@ximian.com>
* camel-multipart.c (write_to_stream): Don't g_return_val_if_fail
here if the boundary is an empty string. See bug #23676 for
details. The way I see it, we have 2 options: 1) leave this fix
the way it is, thus allowing multipart boundaries to be
empty-strings; or 2) make camel_multipart_get_boundary() change
the boundary to something legal if the boundary is an
empty-string. Since the parser should be able to handle an
empty-string boundary *and* more importantly because we want to
keep the same boundaries as the original raw message so as to be
able to verify multipart/signed parts, I vote for solution #1.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=16539
Diffstat (limited to 'camel/ChangeLog')
-rw-r--r-- | camel/ChangeLog | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/camel/ChangeLog b/camel/ChangeLog index fbfe9c60ce..a4ee868465 100644 --- a/camel/ChangeLog +++ b/camel/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +2002-04-19 Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj@ximian.com> + + * camel-multipart.c (write_to_stream): Don't g_return_val_if_fail + here if the boundary is an empty string. See bug #23676 for + details. The way I see it, we have 2 options: 1) leave this fix + the way it is, thus allowing multipart boundaries to be + empty-strings; or 2) make camel_multipart_get_boundary() change + the boundary to something legal if the boundary is an + empty-string. Since the parser should be able to handle an + empty-string boundary *and* more importantly because we want to + keep the same boundaries as the original raw message so as to be + able to verify multipart/signed parts, I vote for solution #1. + 2002-04-19 Not Zed <NotZed@Ximian.com> * devel-docs/camel-index.txt: Start of a white-paperish document |