aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/security
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorohauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org>2016-05-29 17:46:32 +0800
committerohauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org>2016-05-29 17:46:32 +0800
commita289908b67e851919cf41aded8c2e0514c6d0606 (patch)
treedffb4b060c954ef319cd2a973627b68c1c605bdd /security
parent64d5749e5177d68256ec821d8c0fb4cf76795862 (diff)
downloadfreebsd-ports-gnome-a289908b67e851919cf41aded8c2e0514c6d0606.tar.gz
freebsd-ports-gnome-a289908b67e851919cf41aded8c2e0514c6d0606.tar.zst
freebsd-ports-gnome-a289908b67e851919cf41aded8c2e0514c6d0606.zip
- document openvswitch CVE-2016-2074
PR: 208404 Submitted by: ohauer
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
-rw-r--r--security/vuxml/vuln.xml36
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
index 705039fd4eb7..05d072f03be8 100644
--- a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
+++ b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml
@@ -58,6 +58,42 @@ Notes:
* Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.)
-->
<vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1">
+ <vuln vid="b53bbf58-257f-11e6-9f4d-20cf30e32f6d">
+ <topic>openvswitch -- MPLS buffer overflow</topic>
+ <affects>
+ <package>
+ <name>openvswitch</name>
+ <range><le>2.3.2_1</le></range>
+ </package>
+ </affects>
+ <description>
+ <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+ <p>Open vSwitch reports:</p>
+ <blockquote cite="http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/announce/2016-March/000082.html">
+ <p>Multiple versions of Open vSwitch are vulnerable to remote buffer
+ overflow attacks, in which crafted MPLS packets could overflow the
+ buffer reserved for MPLS labels in an OVS internal data structure.
+ The MPLS packets that trigger the vulnerability and the potential for
+ exploitation vary depending on version:</p>
+ <p>Open vSwitch 2.1.x and earlier are not vulnerable.</p>
+ <p>In Open vSwitch 2.2.x and 2.3.x, the MPLS buffer overflow can be
+ exploited for arbitrary remote code execution.</p>
+ <p>In Open vSwitch 2.4.x, the MPLS buffer overflow does not obviously lead
+ to a remote code execution exploit, but testing shows that it can allow a
+ remote denial of service. See the mitigation section for details.</p>
+ <p>Open vSwitch 2.5.x is not vulnerable.</p>
+ </blockquote>
+ </body>
+ </description>
+ <references>
+ <cvename>CVE-2016-2074</cvename>
+ </references>
+ <dates>
+ <discovery>2016-03-28</discovery>
+ <entry>2016-05-29</entry>
+ </dates>
+ </vuln>
+
<vuln vid="1a6bbb95-24b8-11e6-bd31-3065ec8fd3ec">
<topic>chromium -- multiple vulnerabilities</topic>
<affects>