diff options
-rw-r--r-- | security/vuxml/vuln.xml | 31 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml index aa5eded4453..5987ecfd1cf 100644 --- a/security/vuxml/vuln.xml +++ b/security/vuxml/vuln.xml @@ -58,6 +58,37 @@ Notes: * Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.) --> <vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1"> + <vuln vid="44989c29-67d1-11e6-8b1d-c86000169601"> + <topic>fontconfig -- insufficiently cache file validation</topic> + <affects> + <package> + <name>fontconfig</name> + <range><lt>1.12.1</lt></range> + </package> + </affects> + <description> + <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>Debian security team reports:</p> + <blockquote cite="https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138236/Debian-Security-Advisory-3644-1.html"> + <p>Tobias Stoeckmann discovered that cache files are insufficiently + validated in fontconfig, a generic font configuration library. An + attacker can trigger arbitrary free() calls, which in turn allows + double free attacks and therefore arbitrary code execution. In + combination with setuid binaries using crafted cache files, this + could allow privilege escalation.</p> + </blockquote> + </body> + </description> + <references> + <url>https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138236/Debian-Security-Advisory-3644-1.html</url> + <cvename>CVE-2016-5384</cvename> + </references> + <dates> + <discovery>2016-08-05</discovery> + <entry>2016-08-21</entry> + </dates> + </vuln> + <vuln vid="7fe7df75-6568-11e6-a590-14dae9d210b8"> <topic>End of Life Ports</topic> <affects> |