diff options
author | chriseth <c@ethdev.com> | 2015-06-10 23:37:17 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | chriseth <c@ethdev.com> | 2015-06-11 01:28:44 +0800 |
commit | 67299b63522d30b2d83957a4198a282cfd33a90f (patch) | |
tree | 86f6f49eb104f7a5b348dd27eb82b0ab10744e01 | |
parent | bcecae082219abb99157aca5afe9440fac20b516 (diff) | |
download | dexon-solidity-67299b63522d30b2d83957a4198a282cfd33a90f.tar.gz dexon-solidity-67299b63522d30b2d83957a4198a282cfd33a90f.tar.zst dexon-solidity-67299b63522d30b2d83957a4198a282cfd33a90f.zip |
Wallet tests.
-rw-r--r-- | libsolidity/SolidityWallet.cpp | 491 |
1 files changed, 491 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/libsolidity/SolidityWallet.cpp b/libsolidity/SolidityWallet.cpp new file mode 100644 index 00000000..09820b87 --- /dev/null +++ b/libsolidity/SolidityWallet.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,491 @@ +/* + This file is part of cpp-ethereum. + + cpp-ethereum is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or + (at your option) any later version. + + cpp-ethereum is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + GNU General Public License for more details. + + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + along with cpp-ethereum. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. +*/ +/** + * @author Christian <c@ethdev.com> + * @date 2015 + * Tests for a (comparatively) complex multisig wallet contract. + */ + +#include <string> +#include <tuple> +#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> +#include <libdevcore/Hash.h> +#include <test/libsolidity/solidityExecutionFramework.h> + +using namespace std; + +namespace dev +{ +namespace solidity +{ +namespace test +{ + +static char const* walletCode = R"DELIMITER( +//sol Wallet +// Multi-sig, daily-limited account proxy/wallet. +// @authors: +// Gav Wood <g@ethdev.com> +// inheritable "property" contract that enables methods to be protected by requiring the acquiescence of either a +// single, or, crucially, each of a number of, designated owners. +// usage: +// use modifiers onlyowner (just own owned) or onlymanyowners(hash), whereby the same hash must be provided by +// some number (specified in constructor) of the set of owners (specified in the constructor, modifiable) before the +// interior is executed. +contract multiowned { + // struct for the status of a pending operation. + struct PendingState { + uint yetNeeded; + uint ownersDone; + uint index; + } + // this contract only has five types of events: it can accept a confirmation, in which case + // we record owner and operation (hash) alongside it. + event Confirmation(address owner, bytes32 operation); + event Revoke(address owner, bytes32 operation); + // some others are in the case of an owner changing. + event OwnerChanged(address oldOwner, address newOwner); + event OwnerAdded(address newOwner); + event OwnerRemoved(address oldOwner); + // the last one is emitted if the required signatures change + event RequirementChanged(uint newRequirement); + // constructor is given number of sigs required to do protected "onlymanyowners" transactions + // as well as the selection of addresses capable of confirming them. + function multiowned() { + m_required = 1; + m_numOwners = 1; + m_owners[m_numOwners] = uint(msg.sender); + m_ownerIndex[uint(msg.sender)] = m_numOwners; + } + // simple single-sig function modifier. + modifier onlyowner { + if (isOwner(msg.sender)) + _ + } + // multi-sig function modifier: the operation must have an intrinsic hash in order + // that later attempts can be realised as the same underlying operation and + // thus count as confirmations. + modifier onlymanyowners(bytes32 _operation) { + if (confirmed(_operation)) + _ + } + // Revokes a prior confirmation of the given operation + function revoke(bytes32 _operation) external { + uint ownerIndex = m_ownerIndex[uint(msg.sender)]; + // make sure they're an owner + if (ownerIndex == 0) return; + uint ownerIndexBit = 2**ownerIndex; + var pending = m_pending[_operation]; + if (pending.ownersDone & ownerIndexBit > 0) { + pending.yetNeeded++; + pending.ownersDone -= ownerIndexBit; + Revoke(msg.sender, _operation); + } + } + function confirmed(bytes32 _operation) internal returns (bool) { + // determine what index the present sender is: + uint ownerIndex = m_ownerIndex[uint(msg.sender)]; + // make sure they're an owner + if (ownerIndex == 0) return; + + var pending = m_pending[_operation]; + // if we're not yet working on this operation, switch over and reset the confirmation status. + if (pending.yetNeeded == 0) { + // reset count of confirmations needed. + pending.yetNeeded = m_required; + // reset which owners have confirmed (none) - set our bitmap to 0. + pending.ownersDone = 0; + pending.index = m_pendingIndex.length++; + m_pendingIndex[pending.index] = _operation; + } + // determine the bit to set for this owner. + uint ownerIndexBit = 2**ownerIndex; + // make sure we (the message sender) haven't confirmed this operation previously. + if (pending.ownersDone & ownerIndexBit == 0) { + Confirmation(msg.sender, _operation); + // ok - check if count is enough to go ahead. + if (pending.yetNeeded <= 1) { + // enough confirmations: reset and run interior. + delete m_pendingIndex[m_pending[_operation].index]; + delete m_pending[_operation]; + return true; + } + else + { + // not enough: record that this owner in particular confirmed. + pending.yetNeeded--; + pending.ownersDone |= ownerIndexBit; + } + } + } + // Replaces an owner `_from` with another `_to`. + function changeOwner(address _from, address _to) onlymanyowners(sha3(msg.data)) external { + if (isOwner(_to)) return; + uint ownerIndex = m_ownerIndex[uint(_from)]; + if (ownerIndex == 0) return; + + clearPending(); + m_owners[ownerIndex] = uint(_to); + m_ownerIndex[uint(_from)] = 0; + m_ownerIndex[uint(_to)] = ownerIndex; + OwnerChanged(_from, _to); + } + function addOwner(address _owner) onlymanyowners(sha3(msg.data)) external { + if (isOwner(_owner)) return; + + clearPending(); + if (m_numOwners >= c_maxOwners) + reorganizeOwners(); + if (m_numOwners >= c_maxOwners) + return; + m_numOwners++; + m_owners[m_numOwners] = uint(_owner); + m_ownerIndex[uint(_owner)] = m_numOwners; + OwnerAdded(_owner); + } + function removeOwner(address _owner) onlymanyowners(sha3(msg.data)) external { + uint ownerIndex = m_ownerIndex[uint(_owner)]; + if (ownerIndex == 0) return; + if (m_required > m_numOwners - 1) return; + + m_owners[ownerIndex] = 0; + m_ownerIndex[uint(_owner)] = 0; + clearPending(); + reorganizeOwners(); //make sure m_numOwner is equal to the number of owners and always points to the optimal free slot + OwnerRemoved(_owner); + } + function reorganizeOwners() private returns (bool) { + uint free = 1; + while (free < m_numOwners) + { + while (free < m_numOwners && m_owners[free] != 0) free++; + while (m_numOwners > 1 && m_owners[m_numOwners] == 0) m_numOwners--; + if (free < m_numOwners && m_owners[m_numOwners] != 0 && m_owners[free] == 0) + { + m_owners[free] = m_owners[m_numOwners]; + m_ownerIndex[m_owners[free]] = free; + m_owners[m_numOwners] = 0; + } + } + } + function clearPending() internal { + uint length = m_pendingIndex.length; + for (uint i = 0; i < length; ++i) + if (m_pendingIndex[i] != 0) + delete m_pending[m_pendingIndex[i]]; + delete m_pendingIndex; + } + function changeRequirement(uint _newRequired) onlymanyowners(sha3(msg.data)) external { + if (_newRequired > m_numOwners) return; + m_required = _newRequired; + clearPending(); + RequirementChanged(_newRequired); + } + function isOwner(address _addr) returns (bool) { + return m_ownerIndex[uint(_addr)] > 0; + } + + // the number of owners that must confirm the same operation before it is run. + uint m_required; + // pointer used to find a free slot in m_owners + uint m_numOwners; + // list of owners + uint[256] m_owners; + uint constant c_maxOwners = 250; + // index on the list of owners to allow reverse lookup + mapping(uint => uint) m_ownerIndex; + // the ongoing operations. + mapping(bytes32 => PendingState) m_pending; + bytes32[] m_pendingIndex; +} + +// inheritable "property" contract that enables methods to be protected by placing a linear limit (specifiable) +// on a particular resource per calendar day. is multiowned to allow the limit to be altered. resource that method +// uses is specified in the modifier. +contract daylimit is multiowned { + // constructor - just records the present day's index. + function daylimit() { + m_lastDay = today(); + } + // (re)sets the daily limit. needs many of the owners to confirm. doesn't alter the amount already spent today. + function setDailyLimit(uint _newLimit) onlymanyowners(sha3(msg.data)) external { + m_dailyLimit = _newLimit; + } + // (re)sets the daily limit. needs many of the owners to confirm. doesn't alter the amount already spent today. + function resetSpentToday() onlymanyowners(sha3(msg.data)) external { + m_spentToday = 0; + } + // checks to see if there is at least `_value` left from the daily limit today. if there is, subtracts it and + // returns true. otherwise just returns false. + function underLimit(uint _value) internal onlyowner returns (bool) { + // reset the spend limit if we're on a different day to last time. + if (today() > m_lastDay) { + m_spentToday = 0; + m_lastDay = today(); + } + // check to see if there's enough left - if so, subtract and return true. + if (m_spentToday + _value >= m_spentToday && m_spentToday + _value <= m_dailyLimit) { + m_spentToday += _value; + return true; + } + return false; + } + // simple modifier for daily limit. + modifier limitedDaily(uint _value) { + if (underLimit(_value)) + _ + } + // determines today's index. + function today() private constant returns (uint) { return now / 1 days; } + uint m_spentToday; + uint m_dailyLimit; + uint m_lastDay; +} +// interface contract for multisig proxy contracts; see below for docs. +contract multisig { + event Deposit(address from, uint value); + event SingleTransact(address owner, uint value, address to, bytes data); + event MultiTransact(address owner, bytes32 operation, uint value, address to, bytes data); + event ConfirmationNeeded(bytes32 operation, address initiator, uint value, address to, bytes data); + function changeOwner(address _from, address _to) external; + function execute(address _to, uint _value, bytes _data) external returns (bytes32); + function confirm(bytes32 _h) returns (bool); +} +// usage: +// bytes32 h = Wallet(w).from(oneOwner).transact(to, value, data); +// Wallet(w).from(anotherOwner).confirm(h); +contract Wallet is multisig, multiowned, daylimit { + // Transaction structure to remember details of transaction lest it need be saved for a later call. + struct Transaction { + address to; + uint value; + bytes data; + } + // logged events: + // Funds has arrived into the wallet (record how much). + event Deposit(address from, uint value); + // Single transaction going out of the wallet (record who signed for it, how much, and to whom it's going). + event SingleTransact(address owner, uint value, address to, bytes data); + // constructor - just pass on the owner arra to the multiowned. + event Created(); + function Wallet() { + Created(); + } + // kills the contract sending everything to `_to`. + function kill(address _to) onlymanyowners(sha3(msg.data)) external { + suicide(_to); + } + // gets called when no other function matches + function() { + // just being sent some cash? + if (msg.value > 0) + Deposit(msg.sender, msg.value); + } + // Outside-visible transact entry point. Executes transacion immediately if below daily spend limit. + // If not, goes into multisig process. We provide a hash on return to allow the sender to provide + // shortcuts for the other confirmations (allowing them to avoid replicating the _to, _value + // and _data arguments). They still get the option of using them if they want, anyways. + function execute(address _to, uint _value, bytes _data) onlyowner external returns (bytes32 _r) { + // first, take the opportunity to check that we're under the daily limit. + if (underLimit(_value)) { + SingleTransact(msg.sender, _value, _to, _data); + // yes - just execute the call. + _to.call.value(_value)(_data); + return 0; + } + // determine our operation hash. + _r = sha3(msg.data); + if (!confirm(_r) && m_txs[_r].to == 0) { + m_txs[_r].to = _to; + m_txs[_r].value = _value; + m_txs[_r].data = _data; + ConfirmationNeeded(_r, msg.sender, _value, _to, _data); + } + } + // confirm a transaction through just the hash. we use the previous transactions map, m_txs, in order + // to determine the body of the transaction from the hash provided. + function confirm(bytes32 _h) onlymanyowners(_h) returns (bool) { + if (m_txs[_h].to != 0) { + m_txs[_h].to.call.value(m_txs[_h].value)(m_txs[_h].data); + MultiTransact(msg.sender, _h, m_txs[_h].value, m_txs[_h].to, m_txs[_h].data); + delete m_txs[_h]; + return true; + } + } + function clearPending() internal { + uint length = m_pendingIndex.length; + for (uint i = 0; i < length; ++i) + delete m_txs[m_pendingIndex[i]]; + super.clearPending(); + } + // pending transactions we have at present. + mapping (bytes32 => Transaction) m_txs; +} +)DELIMITER"; + +static unique_ptr<bytes> s_compiledWallet; + +class WalletTestFramework: public ExecutionFramework +{ +protected: + void deployWallet(u256 const& _value = 0) + { + if (!s_compiledWallet) + { + m_optimize = true; + m_compiler.reset(false, m_addStandardSources); + m_compiler.addSource("", walletCode); + ETH_TEST_REQUIRE_NO_THROW(m_compiler.compile(m_optimize, m_optimizeRuns), "Compiling contract failed"); + s_compiledWallet.reset(new bytes(m_compiler.getBytecode("Wallet"))); + } + sendMessage(*s_compiledWallet, true, _value); + BOOST_REQUIRE(!m_output.empty()); + } +}; + +/// This is a test suite that tests optimised code! +BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_SUITE(SolidityWallet, WalletTestFramework) + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(creation) +{ + deployWallet(200); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(m_sender, h256::AlignRight)) == encodeArgs(true)); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", ~h256(m_sender, h256::AlignRight)) == encodeArgs(false)); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(add_owners) +{ + deployWallet(200); + Address originalOwner = m_sender; + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x12)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x12)) == encodeArgs(true)); + // now let the new owner add someone + m_sender = Address(0x12); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs(true)); + // and check that a non-owner cannot add a new owner + m_sender = Address(0x50); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x20)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x20)) == encodeArgs(false)); + // finally check that all the owners are there + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(originalOwner, h256::AlignRight)) == encodeArgs(true)); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x12)) == encodeArgs(true)); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs(true)); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(change_owners) +{ + deployWallet(200); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x12)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x12)) == encodeArgs(true)); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("changeOwner(address,address)", h256(0x12), h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x12)) == encodeArgs(false)); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs(true)); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(remove_owner) +{ + deployWallet(200); + // add 10 owners + for (unsigned i = 0; i < 10; ++i) + { + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x12 + i)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x12 + i)) == encodeArgs(true)); + } + // check they are there again + for (unsigned i = 0; i < 10; ++i) + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x12 + i)) == encodeArgs(true)); + // remove the odd owners + for (unsigned i = 0; i < 10; ++i) + if (i % 2 == 1) + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("removeOwner(address)", h256(0x12 + i)) == encodeArgs()); + // check the result + for (unsigned i = 0; i < 10; ++i) + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x12 + i)) == encodeArgs(i % 2 == 0)); + // add them again + for (unsigned i = 0; i < 10; ++i) + if (i % 2 == 1) + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x12 + i)) == encodeArgs()); + // check everyone is there + for (unsigned i = 0; i < 10; ++i) + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x12 + i)) == encodeArgs(true)); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(multisig_value_transfer) +{ + deployWallet(200); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x12)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x14)) == encodeArgs()); + // 4 owners, set required to 3 + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("changeRequirement(uint256)", u256(3)) == encodeArgs()); + // check that balance is and stays zero at destination address + h256 opHash("f916231db11c12e0142dc51f23632bc655de87c63f83fc928c443e90f7aa364a"); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_state.balance(Address(0x05)), 0); + m_sender = Address(0x12); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 100, 0x60, 0x00) == encodeArgs(opHash)); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_state.balance(Address(0x05)), 0); + m_sender = Address(0x13); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 100, 0x60, 0x00) == encodeArgs(opHash)); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_state.balance(Address(0x05)), 0); + m_sender = Address(0x14); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 100, 0x60, 0x00) == encodeArgs(opHash)); + // now it should go through + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_state.balance(Address(0x05)), 100); +} + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(daylimit) +{ + deployWallet(200); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("setDailyLimit(uint256)", h256(100)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x12)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs()); + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x14)) == encodeArgs()); + // 4 owners, set required to 3 + BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("changeRequirement(uint256)", u256(3)) == encodeArgs()); + + // try to send tx over daylimit + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_state.balance(Address(0x05)), 0); + m_sender = Address(0x12); + BOOST_REQUIRE( + callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 150, 0x60, 0x00) != + encodeArgs(u256(0)) + ); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_state.balance(Address(0x05)), 0); + // try to send tx under daylimit by stranger + m_sender = Address(0x77); + BOOST_REQUIRE( + callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 90, 0x60, 0x00) == + encodeArgs(u256(0)) + ); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_state.balance(Address(0x05)), 0); + // now send below limit by owner + m_sender = Address(0x12); + BOOST_REQUIRE( + callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 90, 0x60, 0x00) == + encodeArgs(u256(0)) + ); + BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(m_state.balance(Address(0x05)), 90); +} + +//@todo test data calls + +BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END() + +} +} +} // end namespaces |