Remove v050 check for enforcing "view" in ViewPureChecker.

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 25 deletions

diff --git a/libsolidity/analysis/ViewPureChecker.cpp b/libsolidity/analysis/ViewPureChecker.cpp
index 107eb3aa..18c642c3 100644
--- a/libsolidity/analysis/ViewPureChecker.cpp
+++ b/libsolidity/analysis/ViewPureChecker.cpp
@@ -116,31 +116,22 @@ private:
 
 bool ViewPureChecker::check()
 {
-	// The bool means "enforce view with errors".
-	vector<pair<ContractDefinition const*, bool>> contracts;
+	vector<ContractDefinition const*> contracts;
 
 	for (auto const& node: m_ast)
 	{
 		SourceUnit const* source = dynamic_cast<SourceUnit const*>(node.get());
 		solAssert(source, "");
-		bool enforceView = source->annotation().experimentalFeatures.count(ExperimentalFeature::V050);
-		for (ContractDefinition const* c: source->filteredNodes<ContractDefinition>(source->nodes()))
-			contracts.emplace_back(c, enforceView);
+		contracts += source->filteredNodes<ContractDefinition>(source->nodes());
 	}
 
 	// Check modifiers first to infer their state mutability.
 	for (auto const& contract: contracts)
-	{
-		m_enforceViewWithError = contract.second;
-		for (ModifierDefinition const* mod: contract.first->functionModifiers())
+		for (ModifierDefinition const* mod: contract->functionModifiers())
 			mod->accept(*this);
-	}
 
 	for (auto const& contract: contracts)
-	{
-		m_enforceViewWithError = contract.second;
-		contract.first->accept(*this);
-	}
+		contract->accept(*this);
 
 	return !m_errors;
 }
@@ -232,17 +223,20 @@ void ViewPureChecker::reportMutability(StateMutability _mutability, SourceLocati
 {
 	if (m_currentFunction && m_currentFunction->stateMutability() < _mutability)
 	{
-		string text;
 		if (_mutability == StateMutability::View)
-			text =
+			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				_location,
 				"Function declared as pure, but this expression (potentially) reads from the "
-				"environment or state and thus requires \"view\".";
+				"environment or state and thus requires \"view\"."
+			);
 		else if (_mutability == StateMutability::NonPayable)
-			text =
+			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				_location,
 				"Function declared as " +
 				stateMutabilityToString(m_currentFunction->stateMutability()) +
 				", but this expression (potentially) modifies the state and thus "
-				"requires non-payable (the default) or payable.";
+				"requires non-payable (the default) or payable."
+			);
 		else
 			solAssert(false, "");
 
@@ -251,13 +245,7 @@ void ViewPureChecker::reportMutability(StateMutability _mutability, SourceLocati
 			m_currentFunction->stateMutability() == StateMutability::Pure,
 			""
 		);
-		if (!m_enforceViewWithError && m_currentFunction->stateMutability() == StateMutability::View)
-			m_errorReporter.warning(_location, text);
-		else
-		{
-			m_errors = true;
-			m_errorReporter.typeError(_location, text);
-		}
+		m_errors = true;
 	}
 	if (_mutability > m_currentBestMutability)
 		m_currentBestMutability = _mutability;