Make the Solidity repository standalone.

This commit is the culmination of several months of work to decouple Solidity from the webthree-umbrella so that it can be developed in parallel with cpp-ethereum (the Ethereum C++ runtime) and so that even for the Solidity unit-tests there is no hard-dependency onto the C++ runtime.

The Tests-over-IPC refactoring was a major step in the same process which was already committed.

This commit contains the following changes:

- A subset of the CMake functionality in webthree-helpers was extracted and tailored for Solidity into ./cmake.   Further cleanup is certainly possible.
- A subset of the libdevcore functionality in libweb3core was extracted and tailored for Solidity into ./libdevcore.   Further cleanup is certainly possible
- The gas price constants in EVMSchedule were orphaned into libevmasm.
- Some other refactorings and cleanups were made to sever unnecessary EVM dependencies in the Solidity unit-tests.
- TravisCI and Appveyor support was added, covering builds and running of the unit-tests (Linux and macOS only for now)
- A bug-fix was made to get the Tests-over-IPC running on macOS.
- There are still reliability issues in the unit-tests, which need immediate attention.    The Travis build has been flipped to run the unit-tests 5 times, to try to flush these out.
- The Emscripten automation which was previously in webthree-umbrella was merged into the TravisCI automation here.
- The development ZIP deployment step has been commented out, but we will want to read that ONLY for release branch.

Further iteration on these changes will definitely be needed, but I feel these have got to sufficient maturity than holding them back further isn't winning us anything.    It is go time :-)

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/test/contracts/Wallet.cpp b/test/contracts/Wallet.cpp
index fbab2404..27bdb396 100644
--- a/test/contracts/Wallet.cpp
+++ b/test/contracts/Wallet.cpp
@@ -474,13 +474,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(add_owners)
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(account(1), h256::AlignRight)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(account(1), h256::AlignRight)) == encodeArgs(true));
 	// now let the new owner add someone
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs(true));
 	// and check that a non-owner cannot add a new owner
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(2), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(2), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(2);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x20)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x20)) == encodeArgs(false));
@@ -559,17 +559,17 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(multisig_value_transfer)
 	// check that balance is and stays zero at destination address
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	auto ophash = callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 100, 0x60, 0x00);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(2), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(2), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(2);
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", ophash);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(3), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(3), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(3);
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", ophash);
 	// now it should go through
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(revoke_addOwner)
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs(false));
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs(false));
@@ -598,12 +598,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(revoke_addOwner)
 	m_sender = deployer;
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("revoke(bytes32)", opHash) == encodeArgs());
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(2), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(2), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(2);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs(false));
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(3), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(3), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(3);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs(true));
@@ -621,24 +621,24 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(revoke_transaction)
 	Address deployer = m_sender;
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	auto opHash = callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 100, 0x60, 0x00);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(2), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(2), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(2);
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", opHash);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("revoke(bytes32)", opHash) == encodeArgs());
 	m_sender = deployer;
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", opHash);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(3), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(3), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(3);
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", opHash);
 	// now it should go through
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(daylimit)
 
 	// try to send tx over daylimit
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(
 		callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 150, 0x60, 0x00) !=
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(daylimit)
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	// try to send tx under daylimit by stranger
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(4), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(4), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(4);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(
 		callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 90, 0x60, 0x00) ==
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(daylimit)
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	// now send below limit by owner
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(
 		callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 90, 0x60, 0x00) ==
 		encodeArgs(u256(0))